← Sunday, March 29 | Tuesday, March 31 →
| Mar 30 | 12:05 AM |
| Thomas L. | has left the room |
| Mar 30 | 12:10 AM |
| Russell S. | has left the room |
| Mar 30 | 12:45 AM |
| Dana S. | has left the room |
| Mar 30 | 4:35 AM |
| Brough T. | has entered the room |
| Brough T. | Off to the airport. See you soon. |
| Brough T. | has left the room |
| Mar 30 | 6:35 AM |
| Rafael D. | has entered the room |
| Mar 30 | 6:50 AM |
| Rafael D. | has left the room |
| John S. | has entered the room |
| Mar 30 | 6:55 AM |
| John S. | has left the room |
| Mar 30 | 7:05 AM |
| Lawrence K. | has entered the room |
| Lawrence K. | has left the room |
| Mar 30 | 7:35 AM |
| Stage | has entered the room |
| Ram M. | has entered the room |
| Mar 30 | 7:45 AM |
| Ram M. | has left the room |
| Mar 30 | 7:50 AM |
| Screen | has entered the room |
| Mar 30 | 7:55 AM |
| Fred J. | has entered the room |
| susan m. | has entered the room |
| Mar 30 | 8:10 AM |
| Fred J. | has left the room |
| susan m. | has left the room |
| Mar 30 | 8:20 AM |
| Don J. | has entered the room |
| Mar 30 | 8:25 AM |
| John S. | has entered the room |
| David Y. | has entered the room |
| Alex G. | has entered the room |
| Stig | has entered the room |
| Alex G. | hi all alex and melissa her |
| Steve S. | has entered the room |
| Alex G. | good music! |
| Steve S. | Hiya all! |
| Mar 30 | 8:30 AM |
| Stig | Any decisions on the hashtag? #f2c or #f2c09? |
| Dean L. | has entered the room |
| David Y. | Very good music! |
| Dean L. | hello |
| Britt B. | has entered the room |
| David B. | has entered the room |
| David B. | hello dean |
| Dean L. | greetings
are sent in absentia to all from Jerry Michalski, RageBoy, Identity
Woman (aka Kaliya) and David Blumenstein (aka david dot com) |
| Deb C. | has entered the room |
| Dean L. | aha, David B is here after all, via campfire |
| Ram M. | has entered the room |
| Ram M. | turned on guest access |
| AKMA A. | has entered the room |
| Judi C. | has entered the room |
| Robb T. | has entered the room |
| Judi C. | The video stream for your QUICKTIME (not Real Player) viewing: rtsp://odo.warpspeed.com/f2c09.sdp |
| Stig | Hi Dean! Will be virtual for an hour or so, till the FIOS guy leaves. |
| Mar 30 | 8:35 AM |
| Shawn W. | has entered the room |
| Tony A. | has entered the room |
| Tony A. | Good morning campers. |
| Dean L. | save your copper,Stig -- don't let the FIOS person remove it -- you might yet want it for some other purpose!! |
| Bob F. | has entered the room |
| Ken D. | has entered the room |
| David B. | Quicktime at the ready :) |
| Stig | I told them I wanted to reactivate my ISDN line. He fell for it. |
| Anders F. | has entered the room |
| Dean L. | good job, Stig |
| David B. | has entered the room |
| Bob F. | The FiOS guy never really leaves |
| Anders F. | Greetings from Sweden. The QT feed is live, so thanks Judy and all:) |
| David Y. | :-) |
| Bob F. | Alcatel is useful -- they buy up used phone companies like Lucent |
| Jen G. | has entered the room |
| Alex G. | internet rocks this year. thanks, mr. hendricks! |
| Alex G. | thanks atlantech! |
| Dean L. | is there an official hash tag for F2C? Perhaps #F2C09 |
| Stig | jinx |
| David B. | has left the room |
| Mar 30 | 8:40 AM |
| Alex G. | stig asked same q choose one and it shall be so |
| Alex G. | #F2C09? |
| Bob F. | All these broad bands? |
| AKMA A. | #f2c09 check |
| Dean L. | I just tweeted it, so it may well now be official |
| Dean L. | #F2C09 |
| Nick G. | has entered the room |
| Stig | Hejdå Anders! |
| Anders F. | Hejdå? HejjaPå! |
| David B. | video feed "live broadcast" paused |
| Garret S. | has entered the room |
| Marvin G. | has entered the room |
| Brett G. | has entered the room |
| Bob F. | Is anyone working to speed up existing infrastructure? |
| David B. | has left the room |
| David B. | has entered the room |
| Dana S. | has entered the room |
| Erik C. | has entered the room |
| David W. | has entered the room |
| Mar 30 | 8:45 AM |
| David W. | howdy |
| Brian K. | has entered the room |
| Erik C. | Dean, thanks for the hashtag. |
| Glenn S. | has entered the room |
| Brett G. | RTSP? Aargh.... Didn't particularly want to put RealPlayer on this new machine.... It spies and nags |
| Alex G. | |
| Alex G. | hendricks |
| JoePlotkin | has entered the room |
| Judi C. | thanks Dean |
| Jim W. | has entered the room |
| Judi C. | Video stream does NOT work with Real Player |
| Judi C. | you need to use Quicktime |
| shep | has entered the room |
| Rafael D. | has entered the room |
| Judi C. | quicktime.apple.com |
| saschameinrath | has entered the room |
| David B. | am running quicktime, is any video currently being displayed? |
| Alex G. | [Judi's email address] |
| Alex G. | ? |
| Jen G. | [Judi's email address] to get on here |
| Judi C. | Both Real Player and Quicktime use a version of rtsp |
| Judi C. | but they're different technologies |
| Judi C. | thanks |
| Anders F. | VLC media player works fine too.. |
| Robb T. | has left the room |
| Philip R. | has entered the room |
| Claude A. | has entered the room |
| Brough T. | has entered the room |
| Doc S. | has entered the room |
| Mar 30 | 8:50 AM |
| Peter C. | has entered the room |
| Dick C. | has entered the room |
| isen | has entered the room |
| isen | Hello World |
| Bob F. | World Hello |
| David W. | Well, o, hurled |
| David B. | ifmmn xpsme |
| Jim B. | has entered the room |
| Britt B. | has left the room |
| Shawn W. | has left the room |
| Glenn S. | Burlington Telco is one of the best Telco's in the country - Socialist in nature |
| Bob F. | A telecom model is not the same as a connectrivity model |
| Mar 30 | 8:55 AM |
| Doc S. | http://www.burlingtontelecom.net/ . Not sure I'd call it a "telco," though. |
| isen | Actually
Burlington Tel is independent from the city with its own profit/loss
responsibility --very separate from the city budget |
| Ken D. | VLC is unable to open the MRL 'rtsp://odo.warpspeed.com/f2c09.sdp'. Check the log for details. |
| Ken D. | Ah well... |
| Doc S. | I'd call it a "netco" that's emulating a telco and a cableco while the demand for landline and "cable" TV lasts. |
| isen | Ken are you trying to access the video chat? |
| Bob F. | We seem to be confusing fiber and telcos with connectivity. |
| Ken D. | I am. |
| isen | OK we're working on it |
| Shmuel F. | has entered the room |
| Ken D. | Or, the video broadcast, if that is more correct. |
| Dean L. | one more in absentia hello to F2Cers comes from Howardgr |
| Ken D. | Thanks. |
| Ken D. | I was sure you'd ewant to know about the issue. |
| Doc S. | Montpelier is an old hotel and restaurant district with a state capital building in its midst. |
| Brett G. | Why
the preoccupation with fiber to the home? Wireless is far more
cost-effective and can deliver as much bandwidth as anyone needs, even
with today's technology. |
| Dean L. | I just know there's a Barre-none pun coming |
| Michael W. | has entered the room |
| Bob F. | What is the economic model for roads? |
| Nick G. | has left the room |
| Doc S. | You here, Brett? |
| Dan A. | has entered the room |
| Ken D. | Wow, you can deliver 20Mbps to the home with wireless? |
| David B. | vlc appears to be working, at least the audio |
| Brian K. | No Quick time stream in Woods Hole |
| Michael W. | Well actually, its about 96% |
| Brett G. | I am "virtually" there. Physically, I am in Laramie, Wyoming, looking out the window at a snowstorm. |
| Erik C. | Bob, Roads are failed economic models; we need to do to roads what we did to telecom. ;-) |
| Ken D. | Or don't you believe in the latest speed ratings the Obama Administration is mandating for funding? |
| JoePlotkin | Brett some of us dont live in wyoming |
| isen | Brian we re working on it |
| Michael W. | Tim Nulty speaks truth |
| Brett G. | Developing countries are deploying neither copper nor fiber. They are going right to wireless. |
| Bob F. | Eric -- are you saying we should run tracks to every home so we can run it as a profit center? |
| Judi C. | Video stream is down momentarily. (Learning curve) |
| Doc S. | Do we need to replace the copper wire, or can we scaffold up from copper to fiber, and/or wireless? |
| Michael W. | except in Seattle of course, where its impossible, apparently |
| isen | Tim Nulty speaks experience |
| Ken D. | And they will remain behind the rest of the industrialized world. |
| Glenn S. | I did wireless roll-outs of broadband in Macedonia and Montenegro and designed one now for Albania |
| Alex G. | hi ken you're here virtually? |
| AKMA A. | (Brett, my friend Bruce Schmoetzer (based in MT) is here in Silver Spring, I was hoping to connect you two |
| Dana S. | Brett: they are building for today, not for tomorrow |
| Glenn S. | they are unable to do fiber |
| Michael W. | Broadband |
| Mar 30 | 9:00 AM |
| Dean L. | point of note:price per install to put fiber where copper exists? |
| Ken D. | Virtually. |
| Erik C. | A single fiber optic strand carries more capacity than all of spectrum. |
| Brett G. | Dana, wireless IS the technology of tomorrow. |
| Lynn H. | has entered the room |
| Michael W. | We Want Broadband was the grassroots effort that forced the city to do it in Amsterdam |
| Judi C. | Wireless doesn't work in hilly, mountainous areas like Mendocino Calif |
| Judi C. | Video is back |
| Brett G. | Video has not come back here. |
| Dana S. | Brett: no, its not. It might be *your* tomorrow, but for most people recognize that fiber is the real tech for tomorrow. |
| Brett G. | Wireless does work in hilly areas. I am doing it here in hilly and mountainous areas. |
| Brian K. | Why not go out on a limb... That's where the fruit is (Mark Twain) |
| Ken D. |
|
| Michael W. | The A'Dam effort was a response to grassroots advocacy from De Waag, De Society for Old and New Media, DDS, and XS4ALL |
| Bob F. | I
find it strange that we are talking about the fiber rather than
enabling connectivity. Saying copper can only run 14kbps is strange --
why not us modern technologies? |
| Doc S. | In most of Africa, only wireless is feasible. Or hybrid, with delivery entirely by wireless. |
| Erik C. | My only hope for any wireless is 802.11y; 24 watts matters; 0.5 watts sucks for outdoors |
| Geoff D. | has entered the room |
| Peter C. | has left the room |
| Doc S. | One urban wireless system: http://funkfeuer.at/ |
| Michael W. | hey, that's hacker software!!! |
| Jen G. | |
| David B. | hi dana, long time no speak |
| Michael W. | sorry, no flash in the US |
| Brett G. | Dana: Nice slogan, but not reality. In reality, everyone's cutting the cord and going wireless. |
| Geoff D. | wireless
is great, but it's best used as an extension cord - you wouldn't power
your house with it but it's essential when you don't have an outlet
nearby |
| Dean L. | always comforting at a geektech gahering to see *others* with technical challenges :-) |
| Brett G. | Geoff, wireless is better than any kind of cord, because it can't be cut by a backhoe. |
| Frans-Anton | has entered the room |
| David W. | Do we need a fiber v. wireless panel/debate at f2c? Aim for a Rodney King moment? |
| Geoff D. | Brett - only because we don't have networked experiences that demand the capacity of fiber |
| Ken D. | I'm
sure you have some stats to back that assertion up - what and
considering that wireless is less than 1% of the US connectivity. |
| Bob F. | The
problem is not wireless vs wired as such -- of course you need wireless
to get to 99% of the world but the extension cord is a problematic
model -- you want wireless to the nearest transit point not a single
hop back home. |
| Brett G. | Wireless has capacity equal to that of fiber. (Remember, fiber is nothing but wireless in a tube.) |
| Dan G. | has entered the room |
| Geoff D. | Brett - you can't have robust wireless without robust wireline |
| Geoff D. | i want to see fiber everywhere and wireless everywhere |
| Ken D. | Wireless has a place - mobility. |
| Jen G. | I want WiFi on the bus and fiber at home. |
| Dana S. | David W: very funny! I think that would actually be a fun panel. As long as we had nerf bats! |
| Doc S. | Why not AND logic rather than OR? Copper AND fiber AND wireless. All work. All have sensible uses. |
| Bill S. | has entered the room |
| Ken D. | It is not a fixed solution as spectrum and technology exists today. |
| Jim Y. | has entered the room |
| Mar 30 | 9:05 AM |
| Bob F. | Yes -- wired/wireless bits are the same. I do want to understand what "open network" means. |
| Ken D. | Make that spectrum policy and technology... |
| Geoff D. | Doc - Yes! |
| Michael W. | We tried to bring this A'Dam model to Seattle but no traction |
| Sara W. | has entered the room |
| Bob F. | A'Dam ???? |
| AKMA A. | Amster- |
| Jim Y. | i
know too many who don't have ANY always-on access. it's crippling. why
wait years for fiber if any other tech could get them online today? |
| Dan G. | Doc, if you can replace copper with fiber, good idea, no? |
| Nick G. | has entered the room |
| Dana S. | Agreed, Doc. We do need both, because they solve different problems: Speed vs. mobility. |
| Bob F. | What is the A'Dam model? |
| Brett G. | You
absolutely can have robust wireless without robust wireline. Due to
artificial government restrictions on spectrum, wireline is currently
more viable for long haul communications (i.e. greater than 40 miles).
However, wireless is more cost-effective at any shorter distance. |
| Dana S. | future vs. today |
| Brett G. | And it's better for fixed as well as mobile applications. |
| Dick C. | has left the room |
| Brett G. | We do exclusively fixed wireless broadband. Our customers love it. |
| Ram M. | wifi
on buses available in india now. but wifi in villages - need
electricity first...fiber an interesting choice but not enough
penetration |
| Bob F. | No
need to repalce copper with fiber until you run otu of copper capacity.
We're not even using copper to more than 1% of its capacity |
| JoePlotkin | ok Brett, you're right. |
| JoePlotkin | Can we change the subject now? |
| Jim Y. | Copper
was rolled out incrementally as the country grew. FTTH on the same
timetable would be relatively easy.not a fair comparison |
| Andrew F. | has entered the room |
| Bob F. | If you have to put new stuff in fiber is nice -- and in many counties copper is too valuable and gets stolen |
| Rafael D. | has left the room |
| Andrew F. | Oh, Brett. How nice to see you. |
| Michael W. | The
A'Dam model, using public ROW to lay fiber for residential, government,
and commercial/industrial use. Offer it at near wholesale prices, as a
non-profit enterprise, like garbage collection. It becomes, like Dirk
said, a proof of concept that brings others into the market to compete |
| Doc S. | Dan,
I don't think it's necessary to replace copper with fiber, as a blanket
policy. I do think fiber is a Good Thing, though. We should deploy it
everwhere we can, and it makes sense. Those last four words are what we
debate, of course. |
| Andrew F. | (Brett is a frequent commenter on my articles. I <3 commenters. Really.) |
| Michael W. | In the US, cities |
| Michael W. | in the US cities coudl have done this with i-nets if they had the political will |
| Doc S. | What is the provenance of "A'Dam?" |
| Bob F. | For
A'Dam -- we should really talk about the funding model and alternative.
Given that connectivity is not aa consumable what are we charging for
and do can we presume availability like we do the roads? |
| Erik C. | Bingo
- how Frankstonian of these guys - excellent - connectivity as input
not as "natural monopoly" service; thus "natural commons" instead of
"natural monopoly"; it works; go figure - align public property w/
public infrastructure and all participants benefit. |
| Doc S. | He works on Coriscant! |
| Mar 30 | 9:10 AM |
| Michael W. | also ,Northwest Smug' |
| Benoit F. | has entered the room |
| Brett G. | Inspired by Philly's failed project |
| Bob F. | But free roads are not a sustainable model either |
| Erik C. | Did Seattle ever re-authorize Seattle Power & Light to provision connectivity? |
| Benoit F. | Ah, finally joined. |
| JoePlotkin | I like that phrase "natural commons" |
| David B. | out of failure comes ..... ? |
| Bob F. | Or "bit commons" |
| Michael W. | Sorry, Bill correction, it started in 1998 with a grassroots group called Electra |
| Brett G. | Free roads are sustainable because people are willing to be taxed to build them. |
| Sara W. | don't get me started on the topic of Philly's colossal bumble |
| Alex G. | ! Doc S |
| Sara W. | sp? |
| Ken B. | has entered the room |
| Dirk | has entered the room |
| Bob F. | We've gone dark? |
| Andrew F. | lots of stuff happens in Philly. |
| Michael W. | The 2005 effortcame after Jim Compton was shamed by me, to do it |
| Brett G. | Free broadband is no more sustainable than free natural gas. |
| Erik C. | Thanks
Joe - came up with that in a long discussion with Tim Cowen on Arch
Econ b/c it goes to the root of the solution to what the 1934 Act has
never solved. |
| Sara W. | Philly
is entirely hopeless, and it's all about people. there is nothing about
it of any technological significance. feudalism lives |
| isen | we still have our screens |
| Andrew F. | Have you ever gotten pushed into the Schukylll? |
| Michael W. | it was a effort to shut dwon and close off the grassroots advocacy from CPSR, Microsofties, Mike Apgar and many others |
| Sara W. | no, have you? |
| Brian K. | How much does it cost per mile or per house to install a fiber network in a medium density town of 30,000 people bkaminer@stonybeach.com |
| Dick C. | has entered the room |
| Doc S. | Excuse me, Coruscant: http://img359.imageshack.us/img359/1375/co… |
| Dean L. | Philly hopelessness for the Wifi network is more about politics and corruption than anything else |
| Sara W. | (i doubt it because if you had, you would likely have corroded by now) |
| Michael W. | the chat room is down |
| Erik C. | Brian - I've seen per mile under $10k for hundreds of strands; all depends on layer 0 technology. |
| Andrew F. | the chat room is dead, long live the chat room! |
| Dean L. | down from the screen t AFI, but nor down and out! |
| Dirk | tomorrow Herman Wagter will go into costs |
| Bob F. | Beware bad analogies -- sports stadia are supposed self-funding! |
| Brett G. | All of those e-vile carriers! All broadband providers are obviously evil, you know. |
| Sara W. | @dean l. my sentiments exactly |
| AKMA A. | Key word: "supposed" |
| Michael W. | not is Seattle |
| Aymeril H. | has entered the room |
| Bob F. | @ doesn't work here like with tweets |
| Michael W. | He already thinks he is President |
| David S. | has entered the room |
| Sara W. | as noted, Florence circa ad 1400 was simpler and fairer, politically speaking |
| Andrew F. | what? this isn't twitter? we've been deceived! |
| Bob F. | This is frustrating -- the high order bit fo teh funding model is wrong and we've been silenced. |
| David W. | RT @Andrew F.: what? this isn't twitter? we've been deceived! |
| Paul H. | has entered the room |
| Mar 30 | 9:15 AM |
| Hilarie C. | has entered the room |
| Bob F. | Are we going to get the chat back? |
| Brett G. | Bob
F: You're not the norm. You're a hacker. Most people don't want to roll
their own; they want to buy reliable services and get on with their
lives. |
| Dean L. | the chat remains, the screen is gone |
| Andrew F. | No,it's Brett versus the world.\ |
| AKMA A. | Long live the chat! |
| Bob F. | What about a discussion about the funding model? |
| Sara W. | what gives? |
| Alex G. | the ether is invisible |
| Bob F. | I don't care wireless vs wired |
| David W. | Bob F. is the norm, only for the year 2235. |
| Sara W. | that's a good idea bob |
| Benoit F. | whether we like it or not, there is value for customers in packaging services... |
| Rafael D. | has entered the room |
| Bob F. | No it's - 1934 vs 2009 |
| Dean L. | +1 Benoit |
| Kwerb | has entered the room |
| David W. | Bob F. :) |
| Lynn S. | has entered the room |
| Alex G. | incumbents want it to be about funding the poor -- in areas they already cover. competitors want to build new networks |
| David B. | agree
with bob f., technology sounds good, until it has to scale and someone
has to pay for it, then the perspective shifts greatly |
| Steve S. | isn't the answer ... "both!" |
| Dick C. | what is the video stream UL? |
| Bob F. | We have a funding model -- roads. Why do we choose railroads as the model? |
| Brett G. | Andrew:
Not at all. My customers love me. The people who don't love me tend to
be the people who are lobbyists, etc. rather than doers. |
| Alex G. | wireless not the same as mobile |
| Kwerb |
|
| Bob F. | Leak fiber is a good model for wirless |
| Hilarie C. | Incumbents want to defend their territory, not serve poor or rural. |
| Jim Y. | has left the room |
| Bob F. | Leaky fiber that is |
| Alex G. | cell phones are walled garden -- fixed wireless broadband is usually open |
| Dean L. | billable
events, isn't that what the telecom incumbent model is all about (as
opposed, say, to services or ease of use or customer service) |
| Brett G. | We do wireless backhaul to our hubs. |
| Alex G. | cell phones fail to offer freedom to connect |
| Bob F. | It's wired plus wireless nto wired vs wireless. |
| Ken B. | Dirk has is just right. Wireless and fiber coexist. |
| David S. | but with what capacity, and at what cost? |
| David Y. | Morning Kevin |
| shep | unfortunate that everyone's perception of what wireless is capable of is so heavily shaped by 802.11 and mobile phones. |
| Erik C. | So
long as incumbents run game everyone is poor - it is based upon a
scarcity model - the entire legal / regulatory structure reinforces this |
| Andrew F. | I don't not love you, I just wonder if you are tilting at windmills. |
| Ken B. | The more fiber one has the better the wireless will be. |
| David W. | Bob F, what do you mean by the "leaky fiber" idea? |
| Brett G. | We
do have to do wired connections from there, but only because regulatory
constraints make it difficult to do everything via wireless. |
| Erik C. | Why does everyone talk about cost of building new networks? What's the cost of NOT doing it? |
| Shawn W. | has entered the room |
| Benoit F. | Here
I was thinking that all the "has entered the room" and "has left the
room" messages were IRL messages based on us entering and leaving the
theatre (RFID tags?) Doh! |
| Ken B. | Fiber will ALWAYS be faster than wireless ... |
| Bob F. | You
really want fiber + copper + wireless + whatever -- they aren't
competing -- they can all contribute. It's the funding model that makes
the compete -- they all add to the bit commons. |
| David W. | Benoit, the "entered the room" comments actually track our attention. |
| Jean R. | has entered the room |
| Ken B. | But
... wireless is almost always more convenient, delivering service to
where WE are as opposed to where it is convenient to terminate the
fiber. |
| Mar 30 | 9:20 AM |
| AKMA A. | Bob F. : "It's the funding model that makes the compete" QFT |
| Dan A. | WIreless
has it's applications but you need an fiber backhaul regardless. Also,
wireless people like it better because the get to sell it again in 3
years, when technology changes. |
| Erik C. | 95% of wireless rides landline; backhaul matters. |
| Brett G. | Ken:
As I've said, fiber is nothing but wireless in a tube. The physics are
identical. There is no reason for one to be faster than another. |
| Benoit F. | Glass transmits light faster than air, does it not? I'm not a physicist, but... |
| Michael W. | its not just about mesh and regulatory probs, it is also terrain features and a lot of other small things, added up |
| David S. | Ken B: convenience to access is great, but it comes at the expense of speed |
| Ken B. | And what technology to deploy is really an issue of what investment is available to deploy. |
| Doc S. | Am I a "subscriber" to water, electric or gas utilities? Just asking. |
| Dirk | on straN |
| tim | has entered the room |
| Stig | Leaky fiber? Do not look into fiber with remaining eye. |
| Erik C. | Doc, No, you are a "customer", but point well taken. |
| Michael W. | Well actually, microwave has been used for wireless backhaul for years |
| Ken B. | Brett: the big difference is that "air" has noise and obstructions that glass, usually, does not have. |
| Ken D. | Subscriber = customer then yes. |
| Bob F. | Subscribing to a consumable like water, elec etc makes senese. Subscribing to a nonconsumable like connectivity is problematic. |
| Dirk | has left the room |
| Sara W. | the notion that this is by necessity an either-or type of choice doesn't make sense. |
| Brett G. | Benoit:
Actually, the velocity of light is slightly faster in air. But this
isn't significant; it's throughput that matters, not the tiny
difference in latency at the speed of light. |
| Ken B. | And the lack of noise and "obstructions" dramatically changes the quality and speed of the signal. |
| Andrew F. | (nice to see you here btw Doc...are you...here?) |
| Sara W. | unless one is making a decision re-what to add, rather than what to do with what one already has. |
| John S. | The
issue with wireless isn't physics; it's that wireless is necessarily a
shared resource relative to its wired connection point. So it's always
slower. |
| Doc S. | I are here. |
| Doc S. | Front row, red shirt |
| Brett G. | Ken: Actually, as I've mentioned, wireless is more reliable because you cannot cut it with a backhoe. |
| Michael W. | 'the velocity of light is faster'? RU kidding |
| Ken D. | Backhoe? |
| Sara W. | thank you Doc. i admire your existentialist stance |
| Ken D. | Try lightning. |
| Micah S. | has entered the room |
| Ken B. | We
see this in the enterprise in which it is common to get 1Gbps on
Ethernet, inexpensively, but even with 802.11n we will not see that
speed for another 5 years or so. |
| Ken D. | Backhoes can be designed around. |
| MaryBeth H. | has entered the room |
| Michael W. | Back Ho! |
| David S. | I have 2 fiber strands into my house -- essentially double the wireless capacity |
| Bob F. | Wired plus wireless -- |
| Brett G. | John S.: Wireless can be point-to-point or point-to-multipoint; shared or not. |
| David S. | That isn't possible with wireless |
| Micah S. | Hello, f2c! |
| JoePlotkin | killer app=this chat!! |
| Erik C. | Killer app? No, we need killer infrastructure. |
| Dean L. | Bob F gets VisiCalc props! |
| Stig | Does backhoe = Excavator in the UK? |
| Bob F. | NO NO NO NOT HDTV |
| isen | Bob F just got kudos -- visicalc! |
| Michael W. | the killer app is people! |
| JoePlotkin | peopel is the killer app |
| Andrew F. | ahoy, Micah. |
| Ken B. | Brett: almost any client can be a jammer in wireless AND almost all wireless needs wired backhaul to be effective. |
| Doc S. | All hail Visicalc! |
| Brett G. | David S.: Just use two channels. |
| Sara W. | ++eric |
| Alex G. | and HD Voice |
| Dan G. | Off
topic: There should be a penalty for computer noise in a conference
venue... like the Mac bong startup, or the Skype message-received
noise, etc. |
| Sara W. | oops i meant erik |
| Ken B. | Rah VisiCalc! |
| JoePlotkin | teleconference is participatory |
| Glenn S. | All hail dBase II |
| Andrew F. | grandchildren?!?!?! |
| Dana S. | yes, symmetrical HD video is a killer app |
| David S. | I can do that twice over with the fiber at my home |
| Bob F. | This is backwards -- we're trying to justify high-speed. It's the low speed apps that gave us the network. |
| Andrew F. | don't frighten me! |
| David W. | Won't someone please think about the grandchildren! |
| shep | HDTV with what sort of coding delay? |
| Dean L. | Visicalc truly excels (groan) |
| Erik C. | Sara, I'm flattered being confused w/ Doc. |
| Anders F. | Grandchildren are killer.. apps? |
| Erik C. | Until we have Amsterdam-like infrastructure, killer apps are "products".\ |
| David W. | Attack of the Killer Apps. |
| JoePlotkin | we need to stop using "video" to denote 1-way |
| isen | but via youtube too, no -- does the video really need to b e very HQ?? |
| Doc S. | All
due props to BobF and DanB (the Visicalcians), the killer app for the
PC was everything. There was no "triple play" for the PC. |
| Bob F. | MAD Magazine researched hte picture phone 40 yars ago and showed it actually made communicating more difficult. |
| Ken B. | Actually ... we can get symmetric high speed with wireless .. |
| David W. | Isn't _everything_ the killer app? |
| Andrew F. | that would require I have children first. Which to date I hopefully do not. |
| Ken B. | When deployed correctly. |
| Brett G. | Ken B.: A cable cutter can be a jammer for fiber. A permanent one. ;-) |
| Herman W. | has entered the room |
| Ken B. | With lots of fiber backhaul. |
| Dean L. | Bob F: What, me worry? |
| AKMA A. | Bob F. -- I remember that issue of MAD! |
| Sara W. | please, don't suggest anything about grandchildren. a) i'm too young; b) i have 18 year old daughter. you're scaring me! |
| Dana S. | shep: encoding delay should be no worse than current skype/iChat |
| Brett G. | Also, our wireless is symmetrical; the speaker is incorrect |
| Mar 30 | 9:25 AM |
| David Y. | Doc, agree - killer app for broadband is also 'everything' |
| JoePlotkin | Mad magazine?? |
| Andrew F. | an HD version of the tape from The Ring -- "The Killer App" |
| Bob F. | We can do video calls now and we just dont' do it! We tweet instead! That is very interesting. |
| Doc S. | What's the "killer app" for the iPhone? It's not telephony. |
| Benoit F. | What's a killer app' ? One that brings users or one that brings money? Depending on who you ask, you get different answers... |
| Glenn S. | Macedonia looks even more like Vermont |
| Hilarie C. | televideo in support of rural health care can keep seniors in their home longer |
| Sara W. | ??joe, what are you talking about? |
| Ken B. | To do symmetric wireless however requires high access point density on a fiber backbone. |
| David W. | The App Store is the killer app for the iPhone |
| Bob F. | This is why we should first light up what we have becauase we cnnot anticipate the next Web. |
| David B. | bob f... all about the path of least resistance |
| Brett G. | We can do 1.25 Gbps wireless with off-the-shelf equipment NOW |
| Bob F. | The killer app is not having to have an app |
| David Y. | iPhone (iTouch) killer app => everything |
| Alex G. | Glenn S. -- you had the _national government_ on your side in Macedonia |
| Dean L. | Interesting
that Timcompares VT topology to Poland -- Poland a leader in net
connectivity and a right of connectivity as entitlement |
| Dana S. | Bob
F: not true. I do video calls right now. Its only when we can't easily
do video chat due to technology limits that we don't do it. |
| Doc S. | It's
the fact that it's a data device that does lots of stuff besides
telephony, and the user isn't locked into what only the carrier lets
them use. (Ignoring that it's what only Apple lets you use, but never
mind that.) |
| Benoit F. | FWIW
I agree that home HD video telephony will drive adoption in a huge way.
But telcos don't see a lot of money in there (stupidly IMO). |
| Michael W. | THE KILLER APP IS PEOPLE!!!! NOT MORE INCUMBENTS, NOT MORE CORPORATE DOMINATION, NOT MORE HEDGEMONY |
| JoePlotkin | Mad magazine is now an authority? |
| Ken B. | Brett ... ?? 1.25 Gbps? |
| Bob F. | new fiber is cheaper than new copper. |
| Ken B. | Off the shelf? |
| Bob F. | Killer app is a funding model which doesn't require justifying the value of each app |
| Brett G. | Our company started as a community network; a co-op. The members asked me to take it private. |
| Andrew F. | The killer app is Soylent 2.0 |
| Alex G. | Dilbert is my authority. and http://www.userfriendly.org |
| Herman W. | Communication
is king: content is something to communicate about. Communication needs
excellent latency, excellent latency needs bandwidth symmetrical. |
| Dana S. | Brett: Sure, if you use lasers |
| shep | 69 million dollars for how many people ? |
| Ken B. | Color me skeptical ... love to see the product spec. |
| David B. | dana, you might do video calls, so do i, lots of folks do not want to be bothered - SEESMIC is a "fail" example |
| Ken D. | YEs, E-Band technology hits those speeds with a promise of double that this year. |
| Doc S. | What about those three guys to the right of Tim on stage? |
| Sara W. | ++andrew |
| Brett G. | Yes, Ken: 1.25 Gbps. Look at the sites of Ceragon and Bridgewave, to name two. |
| Andrew F. | (seesmic? fail? zut alors, don't tell loic!) |
| Sara W. | my authority is lester from the wires |
| Ken B. | Point to point and impractical at scale. |
| Hilarie C. | killer app for rural electrification was the milking machine. What makes that same kind of difference for fiber? |
| Sara W. | wire |
| Bob F. | Why can't people add their own wireless cloud by jsut adding access points? |
| Sara W. | lester freamon |
| Brett G. | And that 1.25 Gbps is actually with relatively inefficient modulation schemes. |
| Sara W. | ya feel me? |
| Dana S. | David: its just a matter of time. Video calls need to be as easy as dialing a phone. |
| tim | did you fund the $69m? Yes or no? |
| Doc S. | We used to have railroad to the farm. Would have been nice to have kept the old rights of way. |
| Sara W. | video calls require a willingness to look like crap in public |
| Bob F. | This is why we need a model that lets everyone to add wireless coverage incrementallhy. |
| Erik C. | Every major network rides RR or oil ROW. |
| Brett G. | You can't get universality with fiber, either, without drilling through rock, etc. |
| Bob F. | Technology
pricing is not gbased on current costs. It's based on the "MOore's law"
economics. What people cna do incremntally wins. |
| David B. | Dana: share the access/deja vu :) |
| Erik C. | Brett - just drop fiber in Hwy ROW. |
| Ken D. | |
| Stig | facepalm |
| Ken D. | Among others |
| JoePlotkin | ++ Tim Nulty! |
| roy l. | has entered the room |
| Brett G. | The speaker is making an economic claim without justification. We get as much for wireless service as the telco gets for DSL. |
| Dana S. | yes Tim! |
| Doc S. | Tim's not saying fiber to everywhere. He's saying fiber to where the copper already goes. |
| Bob F. | Again -- this is why leaky fiber works well -- just add lots of local access points. |
| Ken B. | Gigabeam is a PTP wire replacement - not a network. |
| Dana S. | Brett, that's not what he's saying |
| Bob F. | Also this competing with kids is a bogus m,odel that persumes scarce capacity. |
| Andrew F. | so...kill the kids? |
| Brett G. | Again, the speaker is making claims that are simply not technically correct |
| Andrew F. | (making it impossible that grandchildren would be the killer app) |
| John S. | Tim Nulty is EXACTLY right |
| JoePlotkin | Tim is exactly right |
| Bob F. | ARPU -- that sounds like an telco model not connectivity model. |
| Ken D. | That's where the 1.25 Gbps number came from, I believe |
| Mar 30 | 9:30 AM |
| Britt B. | has entered the room |
| tim | yes but did you get the $69m??~~ |
| Marvin G. | has left the room |
| Ken D. | Far be it for me to speak for Brett Glass. |
| Alex G. | many WISPs rely on fiber, esp. in WA state |
| Brett G. | We're building wireless first, and we are growing like gangbusters. |
| Bob F. | So -- can we talk about alternative funding models? |
| Erik C. | ++ Tim Nulty - AGREED; exactly! |
| Bill S. | What kills the business case for wireless is the cost of roof rights. Unfortunately no ROW with roofs |
| David B. | Houston, we have lost audio/video contact |
| Jim Y. | has entered the room |
| Alex G. | one WISP in CA got roof rights from investor Kaiser Permanente |
| Brett G. | Roof rights cost a lot less than right of way and digging. |
| Ken B. | I agree with TIm McNulty ... well said. WIreless is a lovely extension to a strong wired backbone. |
| Erik C. | Bill
S. - wrote a primer on building access from my days at Teligent and w/
various fixed wireless providers - will send you a link if you like erik@erikcecil.com |
| Andrew F. | come on...is there a commissioner lurking? come on... |
| Doc S. | improvised microphony |
| Benoit F. | Oooh, Bob is decidedly coming up to the microphone. |
| Doc S. | Can we have fiber to the microphones? |
| shep | Tim
Nulty is correct about wireless done with currently deployed wireless
technology. But what is physically possible with wireless is actually
much more. |
| Brett G. | Which Bob? |
| Lyle M. | has entered the room |
| Benoit F. | F. |
| catherine | has entered the room |
| Ken B. | For
some applications - where mobility or where a wire CANNOT be run -
wireless can be the foundation technology. But in almost every other
case wired is the foundation for wireless. |
| David S. | This
continues as a technology debate, but it should be an economic debate
about how to stop the US from continuing to fall behind the rest of the
world in informational economy |
| Michael W. | YOUNGER THAN TIM? |
| Ken B. | Hmmmmm ... analog queing for the microphone |
| Micah S. | David S ++ |
| Andrew F. | I am feeling so young right now. Scary. |
| Michael W. | the pencil sharp? Tim, what do you say to that! |
| Ken B. | David - I agree ... but to have the financial discussion - we need to agree on a technology view to focus our investment. |
| Brett G. | Wired
is only the foundation for wireless due to regulation. Were even a
small portion of the unused spectrum put into use, wireless could do it
all. |
| Andrew F. | Micah
Sifry: yes, that's the big picture -- but problem is need to get people
talking about the demand-side of broadband and quit the infighting on
muni vs ilec, etcetc etc |
| David Y. | Chris Savage is in the house |
| Peter C. | has entered the room |
| Michael W. | Don't co-opt them, own them. You will NEVER get an incumbent to work with you, that is not their biz model |
| Shana G. | has entered the room |
| David S. | Ken B - you're right, however, wireless and wireline are not mutually exclusive. Instead, they each have a role. |
| Michael W. | You must be the landlord, not the tenant |
| Ken B. | I
would argue that we need investment in a foundation of fiber backbone
that can be selectively extended via fiber, copper or wireless to the
end customer. |
| Andrew F. | (sees Peter and Shana, starts jumping up and down) |
| Ken B. | David - I agree they are synergistic |
| Mar 30 | 9:35 AM |
| Michael W. | It
is silly to try and get incumbents to change their biz model. They
would rather die first, and some have. That's why the KPN ad Dirk
showed is so unusual |
| David S. | The
US has argued the technology debate for many years, it's time to shift
the focus to the needed outcome which, in my view, is advancing our
downtrodden economy. |
| Harold F. | has entered the room |
| Brett G. | In
other words, municipalities have an unfair advantage over the private
sector. How is it beneficial for government to compete unfairly with
private enterprise? |
| dwitzel | has entered the room |
| Harold F. | Because it gets service to those who need it. |
| Rafael D. | has left the room |
| Harold F. | It's called a "safety net." |
| AKMA A. | Not
even so much that "both wired and wireless have a role" -- both
constitute vast improvement on status quo, whichever can get done needs
to be done |
| Ken D. | Ken
B: I would like to see a business plan, including a full technology
map, prepared, reviewed, accepted and then acted on. Let's do this
once, correctly and get it done. |
| Ken B. | Because private enterprise is not doing it. |
| Michael W. | Bill will go to his grave trying to get Qwest or Verizon to 'partner' and change their model. The idea just doesn't make sense |
| David S. | How
is it beneficial to compete to our detriment with other countries that
are funding network deployment directly at the federal level? |
| Brett G. | My private enterprise IS doing it. |
| Alex G. | here's how to build fiber |
| Alex G. | |
| Ken B. | Ken - rah! Virttual breakout room? |
| Benoit F. | Brett G., how is it competing with private sector if private sector is not willing to go into that market? |
| Michael W. | Thank you Tim. This is a major part of the point. |
| Ken D. | Because private enterprise didn't get the job done, not in the past and certainly not moving forward. |
| Brett G. | Not only are we willing; we are growing as fast as we can. |
| Tom G. | has entered the room |
| Ken D. | Funding has to come from somewhere and Municiplaities have the ability to generate funds. |
| Brett G. | And we would grow faster, were it not that investors are being deterred by the threat of government meddling. |
| David S. | But only wireless? |
| Erik C. | Prof. Tim Brown at Univ. Colorado, prof. EE studied spectrum usage & found that 90-95% unused for a month at a time. |
| Michael W. | Under contract as an independent operator is very different from being an equity partner |
| Brett G. | In particular, the threats of municipal competition and regulation of the Internet are scaring away capital. |
| Jim R. | has entered the room |
| Ken D. | That
said, most Munis don't want to run their networks, they want private
enterprise to come in and do the day to day operations. |
| Shawn W. | has left the room |
| Glenn S. | Alex Goldman - Ken D. said I should say hello to you today if you have time. |
| David S. | Municipalities started into the business because private companies would not |
| matt b. | has entered the room |
| Ken B. | Most muni's are already running an extensive fiber network .. just suboptimally. |
| Brett G. | We
are engineers. We do what works. We would do fiber if we saw that it
was cost-effective in a particular instance. As it happens, we are
doing wireless because it's by far the most cost-effective solution. |
| Judi C. |
|
| Ken D. | Obviously that was because investors weren't being scared away or something. |
| Alex G. | hi Glenn we did speak in the past but always good to say hi again |
| Benoit F. | Furthermore, municipalities want services delivered to citizens that telcos are not willing to deliver... |
| Alex G. | some time ago http://www.isp-planet.com/profiles/2006/ma… |
| Michael W. | Listen to Dirk |
| Michael W. | In A'Dam, they understand it better than anyone else and have been doing it longer |
| Sara W. | he speaks truth |
| David S. | Brett G - the most cost effective solution to what problem? And at what speeds to the average consumer? |
| Mar 30 | 9:40 AM |
| Brett G. | By
the way, my company is not alone.... We have more than 4,000 wireless
colleagues, covering an estimated 3 million square miles. |
| Ken D. | Judy, I wish I could - the video seems to be unavailable from here. |
| Steve S. | he has to say that because he sees bob f in line :) |
| Doc S. | ArbiBastard. Is that domain taken? |
| Michael W. | as opposed to a non-arbotrary bastard |
| Jim Y. | Does
Tim N's argument make sense when muni's are subcontracting out many
former govt activities to make easy profits - example: traffic cameras,
causing ticket rates and costs to community to skyrocket |
| Michael W. | testimony |
| Brett G. | Speed
isn't the issue; it's cost. We can do 54 Mbps of raw speed. However,
users can't afford that much backbone bandwidth because it costs $100
per Mbps in our area. |
| Chris S. | has entered the room |
| Lyle M. | I'd like to see the internet like a public library without the fines for not returning books. How we get there? |
| Michael W. | Mark Cooper submited testimony going back to 98 to try and get Seattle to implment a fiber netwrok |
| Brett G. | So, the equipment is already way ahead of what users can buy. |
| Sara W. | good question doc, but arbybastard would surely get you sued |
| Micah S. | "The killer app is connectivity," Mark Cooper of CFA. |
| David S. | Yet at my home I have 50 mbps symmetrical for $50/month . . . over fiber |
| Doc S. | Who is talking, and who are "we"? Forgive me for being dumb and asking. |
| Brett G. | Satellite is a better technology for delivery of HDTV. |
| Michael W. | long before Jim Compton (who resigned in disgrace) got the idea |
| Doc S. | I get 20Mb symmetrical for $64/mo. |
| Jim Y. | Mobile first mile -- YES |
| Kwerb | has left the room |
| David Y. | Satellite is no good for 2-way HDTV conferencing |
| Ken B. | Mobile first mile. Yup. |
| Joshua B. | has entered the room |
| Ken D. | I get 8 down and 512 up on a good day with the wind at my back - for $62/month |
| Glenn S. | Ken D. You in the cyber-audience? |
| Bill S. | The killer app is dematerialization - http://www.seyboldreport.com/ready-or-not-… |
| Ken B. | Fiber infrastructure to feed. |
| Michael W. | And
as Compton learned, Bill, bless his heart, had been secretly building
the fiber network for years, all the while denying it to the public and
the press |
| Ken D. | I am |
| Brett G. | If we had bandwidth costs that low, we'd deliver what the consumers needed. Wireless technology is up to it. |
| Ken D. | Glenn. |
| David Y. | 20Mbps symmetrical is very good - yea FiOS! |
| Michael W. | Bill Schrier is a true hero |
| Jim Y. | Internet "in the air" where people are means everyone can just connect Right Now. |
| Herman W. | fiber versus wireless is a false dichotomy, they are symbiotic |
| Dana S. | Mark's
point - There are multiple problems: for where connectivity exists,
build fiber. Where no connectivity, or limited connectivity, build
wireless to bring people up to today's standard, using the best
technology available. |
| David W. | Future
proof because will always want mobility, but the wireless
infrastructure isn't future proof, is it? Am I missing Mark's point? |
| Judi C. | Ken D, please send me an email |
| Alex G. | glenn had the natl govt on his side in the balkans |
| Ken B. | Actually .. with deployment of 802.11n - 10-20 Mbps symmetric wireless for first mile is entirely realistic. |
| Michael W. | If the city knew Bill was buidling a network, they would have shut it down |
| Chris S. | Hey, for profit entities can be "good guys" too -- you just need to constrain the profit motive properly |
| Alex G. | wireless future proof yes, but frequent upgrade costs |
| Steve S. | good guys != for profit entities ? |
| Jim Y. | s/mobile/available |
| Micah S. | Mark's blog: http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/6138 |
| John S. | And the question is? |
| Brett G. | So, anyone who is "for profit" is evil? |
| Geoff D. | has left the room |
| Michael W. | Your question, plz? |
| Brett G. | Gee. I guess I don't deserve to put food on the table or meet payrool. |
| Brett G. | (Oops, payroll.) |
| Jean R. | Vermont is the home of the new LC3 - low profit for social benefit (mingling of 501(c)3 and LLC |
| James C. | has entered the room |
| Ken D. | Judi: Done |
| Doc S. | Thanks, David(s), Micah. |
| Mar 30 | 9:45 AM |
| Ron C. | has entered the room |
| Chris S. | Nobody's
clean. For profits want to make profit, which is not always done by
serving the public good (Adam Smith notwithstanding). Municipal
entities are not always public-spirited either. |
| Harold F. | For
profit are neither good guys or bad guys. They are part of the ecology
like everyone else. This is an economic issue, not a morality play. |
| Dean L. | This is a multiDavid environment |
| Brett G. | Killing for-profit companies that create good jobs is NOT pro-consumer. |
| Brett G. | It's a multiGoliath environment too. ;-) |
| Chris S. | Harold, without morality this gets much less exciting... <g> |
| Jim Y. | Tim
N's environment is atypical except for his own state and region. he
also quoted costs for reaching only 65%. cherry picking the easy cases
is not fair. |
| Harold F. | Chris,
Adam Smith knew the score. He just thought government was worse, which
given when he lived and the impacts of merchantilism was not an
irrational conclusion. |
| Ken B. | So Tim ... what DOES it cost per sub for fiber? |
| Chris S. | Harold, I know. Stay tuned for my talk this afternoon. |
| tim | Tim N - your way off track |
| Harold F. | New England rural is not the same as Southwest rural. |
| Brett G. | Patently false. |
| Andrew F. | So physical infrastructure == ownership == maintenence == effort? |
| Brett G. | Wireless works. Why is Tim so prejudiced against it? |
| Andrew F. | therefore subscribers therefore pays? |
| Alex G. | yes tim we'd love $ / cust numbers |
| Erik C. | For
profit is not the issue. Who profits is. Current system profits are
harvested and extracted. Enabling architectures that are open -
connectivity utilities - profit everyone. You cannot serve public
interest by putting private entity in control of public right of way.
Confuses property rights. Natural monopoly is the illusion; natural
commons is the reality. Thus, Tim Nulty! |
| Deb C. | anybody blogging this? link? |
| David S. | See Powell, Wyoming, where a fiber network now exists -- extremely rural |
| Dean L. | Deb C: much tweeeting going on |
| Brett G. | We, as wireless providers, can REACH those remote people. Fiber simply isn't economical for that. |
| Micah S. | Tim
Nulty, nice analogy between rural broadband and rural education: we
don't tell school kids they live too far away from the bus route to get
taken to school. I'm saving that one. |
| David W. | I'm doing some truly AWFUL live-blogging. Irresponsibly bad. (Not posted yet.) http://www.johotheblog.com. |
| Dean L. | |
| Jim Y. | I
helped connect 500sq miles for under $2million in 24 months. granted
the users had to settle for less than HD. but they could all be
connected. |
| Geoff D. | has entered the room |
| JoePlotkin | Peter Capek: C. - dead on |
| Brett G. | Powell's network only covers a very small downtown area. It doesn't reach out of town. |
| Ken B. | Tim's architecture is flawed for wireless. |
| Geoff D. | Brett - Tim isn't anti-wireless; he's anti a wireless-only approach |
| JoePlotkin | that should have been ErikC |
| Andrew F. | so issue w/ wireless is twice the buildout? |
| David S. | In Powell, a public/private partnership is working, the two sides aren't at diametrically opposed odds |
| Chris S. | But
we absolutely do have geographic districts for things like ambulance,
fire coverage, etc. If you are too far out, you don't get service |
| Hilarie C. | wireless doesn't wor in rural coastal CA Bad terrain, Tall redwoods. |
| Ken D. | Northern Minnesota fiber network - and it works. |
| Ken D. | |
| Erik C. | Brett,
talk to Chris Savage about cost of fiber; when he, Dale Hatfield and I
presented to Wyoming Comm'n Conference, Chris showed buildout to the
state on very low cost. |
| Dana S. | Yay Lev! |
| Brett G. | What's more, Powell awarded a monopoly on providing service over that fiber to a single provider. They would not let us in! |
| Vanessa | has entered the room |
| Alex G. | yup that's quite a twitter stream. I participate as ISP-Planet |
| Dan A. | How
many times have we changed wireless technologies in the past 5 years?
How many times have we changed fiber? The fiber is a pipe that will
remain technology neutral... |
| David S. | Powell's network hits 95% of all homes and businesses within City geographical limits |
| Jim Y. | FTTR - fiber to the redwoods, then wifi from there |
| Harold F. | I'm haroldfeld |
| matt b. | Which is a better channel for us virtual people? Twitter or Campfire? |
| Harold F. | on twitter |
| Ken B. | Yup. Pragmatism must rule. |
| Dick C. | Don't you mean, "..responsibly bad..", David W.? |
| John S. | As far as I can tell there is only one person recommending a single "superior" technology. |
| shep | the post office provides connectivity. |
| Paul W. | has entered the room |
| Stig | Campfire has the advantage of being visible to the participants in real time. |
| Mar 30 | 9:50 AM |
| JoePlotkin | Bob's head is about to explode |
| Mar 30 | 9:50 AM |
| Andrew F. | connectivity means those guys getting a microphone over there |
| catherine | has left the room |
| Brett G. | I know all about Jaguar Communications. They also do a great deal of wireless! |
| Jim Y. | Tim's "Everybody" excludes a lot of people in this country. |
| Harold F. | David, pull us back! |
| Geoff D. | good point, Dan A. - there's too much uncertainty in wireless technologies today |
| Harold F. | Thank you! |
| Glenn S. | Everyone does not have a broadband connection which is now the digital divide |
| Alex G. | joe I like Bob's hand gestures |
| Michael W. | Thank
you. And this is the lesson we learned in A'Dam; it is about all the
applications, We WANT BRoadband,,, do it all, try everything, use the
municipality as a lab |
| Geoff D. | Jaguar Communications rocks! Donny Smith's a P-I-M-P |
| Herman W. | there is a nice paper by nico baken on the symbiotic relationship between fiber and wireless |
| Dean L. | 4 Questions...no, that's next week |
| fpaynter | has entered the room |
| Michael W. | Bill, I kiss you! |
| AKMA A. | David Isen ++ |
| Brett G. | Again, I am an engineer. I deploy what works. |
| fpaynter | hello |
| shep | that would count as a "rough consensus" |
| Dean L. | fpaynter joins us! |
| Ken B. | Yup. Fiber + wireless. |
| Ken B. | Now .. let's get concrete. |
| Andrew F. | Fireless! |
| AKMA A. | Alas, "fired" |
| Harold F. | Cell phone has a DNA problem. Remaking network not easy. |
| Steve S. | so
many other things to discuss (and we'll get there): a) long haul
interconnectivity, packet prioritization, global net censorship, lawful
intercept, content issues, innovations in applications, etc. |
| Brett G. | Again, fiber is only necessary as a foundation for wireless due to wireless regulation. |
| Ken B. | Oh no ... mesh does not scale. |
| JoePlotkin | Wiber? |
| Andrew F. | mesh battery nightmare |
| Michael W. | Agreed, but let's get beyond this |
| Jim Y. | wifiber |
| Harold F. | Whatever works. |
| Brett G. | Wireless mesh architectures can be proven to be infeasible. |
| Ken B. | Sigh. To make wireless work well ... we need lots of wire. |
| Alex G. | government hates mesh because mesh makes wiretaps difficult |
| matt b. | They f2c site reads, "Details on how to connect to the video stream will appear here at about 8:00 AM Monday 3/30." |
| Brett G. | We have worked with everything out there and even tried to design something better. |
| David W. | Ken B: I thought Vienna was scaling mesh successfully. No? |
| Andrew F. | vienna scales chocolate pretty well |
| Harold F. | Government doesn't hate mesh, they just don't get it. |
| Dean L. | matt b: [link removed] |
| Jim Y. | i don't think we're talking about big meshes, just pragmatic ones |
| Brett G. | We then went back to the theory and proved beyond question that mesh doesn't work. |
| Paul W. | need
revenue to have a sustainable biz plan.. we don't need gvmnt to have to
continue to fund a network forever.. fiber wins this debate.. both
technologies compliment. |
| Michael W. | yet..... |
| Ken B. | Now
.. all networks are "mesh" .. however, broadcast multi-hop mesh just
does not scale ... but routed, directed "mesh" has much higher capacity. |
| Dana S. | Wireless Mesh works, and has been proved to work. It doesn't have the same characteristics of a hub-and-spoke. |
| Hilarie C. | How do you defend wireless to the rural residents afraid we're "killing their children" Studies we can quote? |
| Ken B. | But this is a detail at the edges. |
| Brett G. | Mesh doesn't work for any value of "work" that consumers care about. |
| saschameinrath | For those who think mesh doesn't scale -- here's a live view of the Vienna, Austria metro-scale mesh: https://map.funkfeuer.at/experimental -- all open source, and free to all participants. |
| Chris S. | Sascha, how is it paid. BobF has a point: issue isn't technology, it's funding model |
| Mar 30 | 9:55 AM |
| Andrew F. | oooh, so use the copper to deliver wireless? |
| Ken B. | Mesh scaling .... (.5)^n is the bandwidth reduction for n hops. |
| Dean L. | matt b: rtsp://odo.warpspeed.com/f2c09.sdp |
| Herman W. | http://www.dadamotive.com/2009/03/wireless… paper by Nico |
| Michael W. | agreed S, and in Leiden, and San Fran, and other places. But I think we are missing the point |
| Brett G. | If it's free, it's neither sustainable nor technologically feasible. |
| Michael W. | Listen to Dirk |
| Sara W. | http://twitter.com/f2c = converting from farenheit to celsius (an analogy?) |
| Brett G. | Copper, like fiber, is "wireless in a tube." It's just a different kind of tube. |
| Ken B. | The Rolling Stones model of funding. |
| Glenn S. | Mitch Kapor - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitch_Kapor |
| Ken B. | Gotta love it. |
| Steve S. | yay to our moderator, keep it moving |
| Michael W. | option value... excellent, the value is inthe options, choices |
| Bob F. | It's hard to ask a real qeustion from the audience |
| Andrew F. | hmm. i want a wireless SUV. |
| Bob F. | THe problem is in assuming "a network" that's like requriring railroads to travel |
| Andrew F. | (misses ted stevens already :-( ) |
| saschameinrath | here's the Guifi.net mesh wireless network (several thousand nodes spanning a whole region of the country): http://www.guifi.net/en/node/3671/view/map |
| Bob F. | We need a model which is more basic that allows us to do our own netorking without having to pay a provider. |
| Michael W. | Dirk has provided for you a way out of the thicket... that the choices ARE the answer |
| Paul W. | assuming cooper can support xdsl.. much of rural fiber is damaged.. water & copper = don't work.. |
| Jean R. | Andrew F - have you seen the wireless electricity coming out. :) |
| Brett G. | The
Internet is not a "public way" and was explicitly designed not to be.
It was designed to be a federation of PRIVATELY owned networks, each
with different ownership, rules, etc. |
| Dana S. | http://www.awmn.net/ - one of the most impressive and fully functional networks |
| Bob F. | I still don't understand how Dirk's model gives me the ability to communicate if I find myself in the middle of A'Dam. |
| Andrew F. | Jean Russell: R I saw "The Prestige" a few times. David Bowie made a great Tesla. Does that count? |
| Ken D. |
|
| Steve S. | brett that's a good topic for us to discuss at some point here |
| saschameinrath | i can keep providing examples -- but hopefully these illustrate that scalable mesh does work and is a reality today. |
| Brett G. | No mesh can offer adequate performance. Simple math. |
| Sara W. | did he just say something implying that high speed connectivity was all about renting movies online? |
| Sara W. | if yes, i find that mortifying |
| Michael W. | ALL of Seattle is underserved. There is no service above 1.5 residential in the entire city |
| Brett G. | Renting movies online is certainly what it's about for a lot of people. |
| AKMA A. | Nothing wrong with priesthood |
| Dana S. | |
| Hilarie C. | How can rural cooperatives afford maintenance on aerial fiber? We have trouble keeping power lines up all winter. |
| Dana S. |
|
| Geoff D. | wow - amazing how far behind the curve some of our cities are, even those considered to be tech hubs! |
| Sara W. | all of philly is, i imagine, even worse (not knowing seattle that well) |
| Ken B. | Sascha - let's go measure one like I have measured most of the US wireless networks ... conventional mesh does NOT scale. |
| Bob F. | We've had no improvements in DSL for 20 years -- isn't hat suspicious? |
| Brett G. | People are dumping their cable connections and streaming video over our network; we see the impact on bandwidth at "prime time" |
| saschameinrath | Ken -- what do you define as "scale"? |
| Dick C. | has left the room |
| Ken B. | High performance to lots of people. |
| Bob F. | Yes -- fiber is wonderful. but why wait for it? |
| Mar 30 | 10:00 AM |
| Brett G. | Bob F: Where have you been? U-Verse is DSL on steroids. |
| David W. | "Glass doesn't corrode" - Brett's new personal tagline? |
| Dan A. | Do it once and do it right? |
| Andrew F. | oh snap |
| Brett G. | Wireless is also carrying more and more as technology improves. |
| Glenn S. | Joanne Hovis doing a GREAT Job with the panel |
| AKMA A. | "Wireless doesn't corrode either"? |
| Andrew F. | but he shouldn't throw stones. |
| Steve S. | or backhoes |
| Andrew F. | ok laptop shutting. come say hello during the break! |
| Sara W. | they
have free wireless internet access in the canadian rockies, but not on
a random street corner in downtown philly---unless you're willing to
pay something along the lines of $3.95 for a 1-hour connections |
| David W. | joanne +1 |
| Brett G. | David W: I hope it doesn't. I seem to be the target of some acidic comments at times. |
| Harold F. | Agree that Joanne is AWESOME! |
| Geoff D. | I ♥ Joanne Hovis |
| Bob F. | Private vs public is a false dichotomy. Today's so-called private companies are creations of the government. |
| Brett G. | They haven't seen our private sector efforts. No municipal network can beat us. |
| Bob F. | A phone compnay would not exist were it not for the government giving infrastructure providers a role as gatekeeper |
| Harold F. | There is a difference between assuring a minimum level of connectivity for everyone and what the private sector does. |
| David S. | It's
not about wireless vs wireline or private vs public networks -- it's
about US communities vs those in Amsterdam, Malaysia, China, Korea,
Japan, etc., etc. |
| Bob F. | Screen saver for teh hecklebot!!?! |
| saschameinrath | Ken -- here's a link to the Djursland Wireless network -- it covers 3000 square kilometers and 6000 households. |
| Bob F. | The problem is the very concept we must have network service provdiers rather than recongizing networking is an activity. |
| Harold F. | Munibroadband is the public transportation system. It doesn't compete with car lots or taxi cabs. |
| saschameinrath | |
| MaryBeth H. | ++open access |
| Bob F. | We shoudl have health care doing networking now intsead of waiting for magic. |
| Brett G. | Bob F: That's historically incorrect. In fact, the telcos were given a monopoly AFTER they had already started. |
| Harold F. | Bob F: First we need to get doctors to adopt. |
| Alex G. | "Many
large ISPs (the phone and cable companies) got to be that way not
through entrepreneurial excellence or good customer service or the
deployment of the most advanced technologies," he told
InternetNews.com. "They got to be that way because they inherited an
asset that was built 30 years ago in the case of cable and 100 years
ago in the case of the phone companies." http://www.internetnews.com/government/art… |
| Benoit F. | Illustration of Tim's point on public services and school buses: http://tinyurl.com/cd6jyb |
| Michael W. | Bill, plz... you are NOT a muni lawyer. I am |
| Chris S. | Harold, public transport does compete with private. Not necessarily bad, but it is a fact. |
| saschameinrath | i agree that wireless doesn't have the capacity of fiber, but it's far more cost-effective in some conditions and locales. |
| Shana G. | has left the room |
| Brett G. | There
are some serious problems with universal electronic medical records. In
particular, under our current insurance system they make it possible
for insurers to claim that nearly any condition is "pre-existing." |
| Sara W. | sascha, are you (physically) here today? i need to ask you a question |
| David W. | sex? |
| David W. | oh, music. |
| Chris S. | Sascha, e.g., here. Should we all have fiber plugs here at each seat? |
| Sara W. | why not? (i'll come find you during the break) |
| Mar 30 | 10:05 AM |
| Brett G. | Alex, the phone companies have actually done a great job of repurposing that old infrastructure. DSL is quite a hack. |
| saschameinrath | sara, yes i'm here -- down in front at the moment. |
| Dan G. | has left the room |
| Brett G. | (Leaves the console to brew a pot of coffee) |
| Jim Y. | has left the room |
| Doc S. | holy shit these guys are fucking amazing. |
| Mar 30 | 10:10 AM |
| Don J. | has left the room |
| Doc S. | |
| Kevin D. | has entered the room |
| Shmuel F. | has left the room |
| Andrew F. | has left the room |
| Mar 30 | 10:15 AM |
| Vanessa | has left the room |
| AKMA A. | has left the room |
| Tony A. | has left the room |
| Bob F. | has left the room |
| Jen G. | has left the room |
| Dana S. | has left the room |
| Michael W. | has left the room |
| Dan A. | has left the room |
| Lynn H. | has left the room |
| Bill S. | has left the room |
| Sara W. | has left the room |
| Nick G. | has left the room |
| David S. | has left the room |
| tim | has left the room |
| MaryBeth H. | has left the room |
| roy l. | has left the room |
| Britt B. | has left the room |
| Chris S. | has left the room |
| Geoff D. | has left the room |
| Rafael D. | has entered the room |
| Steve S. | has left the room |
| shep | has left the room |
| Frans-Anton | has left the room |
| Benoit F. | has left the room |
| Lynn S. | has left the room |
| Harold F. | has left the room |
| Ron C. | has left the room |
| roy l. | has entered the room |
| Mar 30 | 10:20 AM |
| Brough T. | has left the room |
| Paul H. | has left the room |
| Garret S. | has left the room |
| Ken B. | has left the room |
| Mar 30 | 10:25 AM |
| Heath R. | has entered the room |
| Doc S. | has left the room |
| Brent S. | has entered the room |
| Casey L. | has entered the room |
| Brett G. | (Fresh pot of Peet's House Blend. Yum.) |
| tim | has entered the room |
| JoePlotkin | has left the room |
| dwitzel | has left the room |
| Tom G. | has left the room |
| Kevin D. | has left the room |
| Judi C. | testing, testing... |
| Dean L. | You pass the test, Judi |
| Mar 30 | 10:30 AM |
| Philip R. | has left the room |
| Joshua B. | has left the room |
| roy l. | has left the room |
| David B. | Dean L. welcome back |
| Judi C. | video stream just reset (you may need to restart your quicktime stream) |
| Genny P. | has entered the room |
| fpaynter | url for video? |
| matt b. | rtsp://odo.warpspeed.com/f2c09.sdp |
| Steve S. | has entered the room |
| matt b. | but, haven't gotten it to work yet |
| Steve S. | any coffee geeks here got a reco for a good macchiato after lunch? |
| Hilarie C. | has left the room |
| Ken D. | matt b: Me either |
| fpaynter | @ matt b: r u on a Mac or Cheez, I mean PC? |
| Mar 30 | 10:35 AM |
| Ken D. | No luck with Linux (VLC and Totem) or Windows. |
| matt b. | mac |
| matt b. | leopard, QT 7.5.5 |
| Don J. | has entered the room |
| matt b. | "Live Broadcast - Paused" it says |
| Brett G. | $800 for a wi-fi router? |
| Paul H. | has entered the room |
| Chris S. | has entered the room |
| Paul B. | has entered the room |
| Dirk | has entered the room |
| Brett G. | That |
| Brett G. | will burn up your 1 GB cap real quick. |
| Jen G. | has entered the room |
| David W. | what time does this thing rattle to a close tomorrow? |
| David W. | Damn. I wanted more ado! |
| Judi C. | if your video broadcast has paused, please restart the video. I had to reset the stream during the break |
| matt b. | when does the next panel start? |
| Ken B. | has entered the room |
| matt b. | i closed QT and relaunched |
| Brett G. | Google |
| matt b. | does "restarting the video" entail something else? |
| Geoff D. | has entered the room |
| Ken B. | Cradlepoint also makes a nice EVDO/HSDPA mobile router ... |
| Mar 30 | 10:40 AM |
| Shmuel F. | has entered the room |
| Tony A. | has entered the room |
| Shmuel F. | has left the room |
| Lynn H. | has entered the room |
| Shmuel F. | has entered the room |
| Brett G. | "Network Neutrality" == Regulation of the Internet, discouraging innovation and investment in deployment |
| Kwerb | has entered the room |
| Marvin G. | has entered the room |
| Nick G. | has entered the room |
| Doc S. | has entered the room |
| Frans-Anton | has entered the room |
| Robb T. | has entered the room |
| Joshua B. | has entered the room |
| Paul H. | Steve - my favorite coffee in downtown S.S. is Mayorga Coffee Factory, but it's a bit of a hike (3/4 mi?) 8040 Georgia Ave. |
| David S. | has entered the room |
| Brett G. | "Kill the Internet?" |
| Dana S. | has entered the room |
| Judi C. | how about close the video window, then go to Recent (File menu) and open the stream again? |
| Steve S. | Yay thanks Paul, sounds like a possible way to stretch my legs during lunch break! |
| Garret S. | has entered the room |
| Michael W. | has entered the room |
| David W. | Don't take the bait. Don't take the bait. |
| Steve S. | ... has given way ... |
| Robb T. | Irene |
| Michael W. | is there a way to block someone in the chat from my screen? |
| Brett G. | Yes, this is a critical juncture: Politicos try to take control of technology to advance their own agendas |
| matt b. | Nope. And every time I try, it's a huge strain on my system. I'm giving up. |
| John S. | Don't take the bait. |
| AKMA A. | has entered the room |
| JoePlotkin | has entered the room |
| matt b. | has the politics session started? |
| Lynn S. | has entered the room |
| David W. | zittrain +1 |
| Robb T. | Irene call kathy |
| David W. | or is it 1+ ? |
| Ramon E. | has entered the room |
| AKMA A. | (Berkman mafia sticks together) |
| David W. | I'm dysleftic. Can't tell left from right. |
| fpaynter | I'd give my right hand to be ambidextrous |
| Mar 30 | 10:45 AM |
| Chris S. | Politics sometimes leads technology and sometimes follows. Are we now in a time when politics leads? |
| Paul H. | Yes, politics session going. Tim Karr speaking |
| shep | has entered the room |
| Hilarie C. | has entered the room |
| JoePlotkin | Chris, politics has 8 years of catching up to do |
| Shmuel F. | Is it possible to get tim's pwpt? |
| Jeff | has entered the room |
| David W. | Politics and tech are too intertwingled to decide which leads. |
| Lynn H. | Steve: best coffee in town at Kefa Cafe... 3 blocks down Georgia on Bonifant |
| Alex G. | can someone close the door? |
| Erik C. | Chris S. I'd offer technology is transforming politics while politics (as usual) has collapsed. |
| David W. | Don't you want to supply all the missing "<<"s from Tim's talk? It IRKS me!!! |
| Dana S. | Can we close the auditorium door? I'm too far away... |
| Benoit F. | has entered the room |
| Andrew F. | has entered the room |
| isen | has left the room |
| Brett G. | Creating a straw man to fight.... Make carriers out to be evil |
| Jeff | Alex G.: Need... air! |
| Andrew F. | *gag* |
| Chris S. | Eric,
politics has not collapsed. What do you mean? And, Joe, politics can
"catch up" with a change of administration -- like we just had. |
| David W. | Hmm. Crowd-sourcing the closing of the door seems not to be working. |
| Russell S. | has entered the room |
| Andrew F. | the violins are for the dying media? |
| Peter C. | has left the room |
| Brett G. | Audio on the stream just went dead. Video is still going. |
| iz | has entered the room |
| Steve S. | thx Lynn H |
| Michael W. | Yeah |
| Chris S. | How about this: Hey you! Yeah, you, by the door! Get up and close it, OK? <g> |
| fpaynter | audio out here too |
| JoePlotkin | Yes we are desperate to have them catch up -- but they have LOTS to do |
| Brian W. | has entered the room |
| David S. | Failed audio stream = virtual closing of door |
| Chris S. | The Kitty Genovese effect at work. Too many people are "by the door..." |
| Erik C. | Chris,
that's relative to how one defines politics; Obama campaign collapsed
old systems; illusion of free market (certainly a form of politics b/c
you can't separate gov't, regulatory paradigms, etc. from the ideology)
has collapsed as well; technology enabling ground up everywhere. |
| Michael W. | Is this the Chiropratic Conference? |
| Andrew F. | ++ Chris S |
| Brett G. | If it were, we could adjust the door. |
| Harold F. | has entered the room |
| Shawn W. | has entered the room |
| Michael W. | I feel better already |
| Jeff | There is no privacy |
| Arnon K. | has entered the room |
| Mar 30 | 10:50 AM |
| fpaynter | hah, I get it... "Perfect alignment" (I can read, but I still can't hear) |
| Jean R. | principles: Openness, Transparency, Innovation, Privacy, Access - princples of Perfect Alignnment |
| Brett G. | Still no sound |
| Shawn W. | Transparency is about more than just making the information available. It must also be accessible -- citizen-friendly. |
| Chris S. | Brett, are you still in Wyoming today? |
| Brett G. | Last I checked. ;-) |
| Erik C. | Transparency
is also about relevance - look at FCC website - info is there but
you've got to have some expertise to locate what matters. |
| David W. | Ellen does fantastic work! Ellen +1 and/or Ellen 1+ |
| Alex G. | oh noes! vista! |
| Micah S. | REposting Dan Gillmor's joke: uh oh, launching vista...we have time to get coffee |
| Chris S. | So,
is PowerPoint evil because it screws up creating and connected
presentations? Or is it critical so remotely located folks can follow
along even when the audio goes out...? |
| Brough T. | has entered the room |
| Micah S. | actually, not |
| Rafael D. | has left the room |
| Kwerb | has left the room |
| Michael W. | that's so nice |
| Micah S. | Follow @ellnmllr on Twitter, plus http://www.sunlightfoundation.com |
| Sara W. | has entered the room |
| Michael W. | Go Ellen!!!! |
| Aleecia M. | has entered the room |
| sean s. | has entered the room |
| David W. | Go Sunlight Foundation!!! |
| Michael W. | Hurray for the Congress pop-ups |
| Michael W. |
|
| Dean L. | Thank you, Lynn! |
| Michael W. | great taffy |
| Michael W. | salt water taffy |
| David W. | Shouldn't the photo be of _sausages_ being made? |
| Andrew F. | mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm taffy |
| Dean L. | heh, looks like a certain shroom |
| Michael W. | that's pizza i'm guessing |
| Micah S. | You want to see how they make taffy in Congress? |
| Chris S. | Are we now going to hear about "sticky" marketing campaigns...? |
| Andrew F. | no, that's the NORML powerpoint |
| Michael W. | meat or no? |
| Micah S. | We're going to chew on things now |
| Dean L. | or campaigns from Atlantic City? |
| Brett G. | If
sunlight is indeed the best of disinfectants, why do so many DC
lobbying groups refuse to reveal their funding sources? Free Press, for
example, will not reveal who funds it. |
| Michael W. | eat it up guys |
| Dan A. | has entered the room |
| Mar 30 | 10:55 AM |
| AKMA A. | Rah, rah, rah |
| Michael W. | don't take the bait, people |
| Andrew F. | Brett G: 501(c)(3) has to make their donors available. |
| Michael W. | don't take it |
| Chris S. | "Band of Bloggers"? I like it. "We few, we happy few..." |
| Brett G. | Actually, Andrew, they aren't required to reveal that portion of their Form 990. |
| Fred J. | has entered the room |
| Brett G. | Perhaps this is something that Congress should change! |
| Harold F. | We band of bloggers, for he who burns his bits with me this day shall be my brother . . . |
| Robb T. | has left the room |
| Harold F. | No matter how vile, this day shall make him not a troll! |
| Michael W. | bad pizza that is |
| Michael W. | Coach! |
| iz | But no real fallout on Rangel right? |
| David W. | We band of brothers, for he who burns his bits with me this day shall be my blogger . . . |
| Aleecia M. | sausage pizza, of course |
| Andrew F. | He could out-wrestle you though |
| Michael W. | back to high school wrestling? |
| Dean L. | Rangel just ignores bad news |
| Chris S. | Andrew: that's such an ugly thought. Cf. "Barton Fink" |
| Dean L. | He and Barney Frank should do cartoon voices togetherr |
| Andrew F. | Charlie Rangel is indistructable. He and John Dingell have superhuman robot bodies. |
| Sara W. | Andrew: the real shadow organizations are the 501c(6)'s and the like |
| Brett G. | Does this make you "blog brothers?" |
| Michael W. | the pizza delivery man? |
| iz | dean: and limericks |
| Michael W. | follow the pizza.... |
| Dean L. | iz: heh |
| Deb C. | we few, we happy few |
| Michael W. | that's my hand!!! |
| David W. | funny photo (Stevens' palm) |
| matt b. | has left the room |
| Andrew F. | umm |
| Andrew F. | hold? |
| Steve S. | great slide |
| Andrew F. | COBURN! |
| Michael W. | you can't show Steven's hand |
| Chris S. | iz: There once was a blogger named Rick |
| iz | she is doing the callout to her peeps rasiej and sifry :-) |
| Micah S. |
(9 more lines)
|
| Michael W. | now he is home in Alaska... eating pizza!!! |
| Chris S. | Who saw things that made him quite sick... |
| Andrew F. | No, you can't show Inouye's (non) hand |
| Sara W. | staying
on the topic of 501c(x)'s, a lot of ostensible non-profits actually
plop a lot of their resources there--where there is not nearly as much
oversight and reporting requirements are almost nil. |
| Dean L. | there once was a pol named Charlie Rangel |
| Micah S. | |
| David W. | oh, micah, you and your facts! So cute! |
| Dean L. | with whom the NY press did tangle |
| Michael W. | M, don't take the bait |
| Sara W. | fact are soooo cute. |
| Sara W. | i meant facts. |
| Andrew F. | Dean: Charlie hasn't had a bad day since. |
| Sara W. | i'm in my preverbal state at the moment |
| Brett G. | The
real "shadow organizations" are the ones that aren't even set up as
trackable organzations. For example, "Save the Internet" and "Internet
for Everyone." |
| David W. | 1 million of those searches were from Sen Stevens, looking for his glasses. |
| Mar 30 | 11:00 AM |
| iz | can we stop feeding the trolls in here please? |
| Mar 30 | 11:00 AM |
| Dean L. | yeah, Charlie kept the 2 apts and the Carib digs |
| Michael W. | don't take it |
| James C. | has left the room |
| Brett G. | Micah: Source for that list? |
| Judi C. | David W, they got caught in the tubes. |
| Sara W. | oddly, sen stevens was searching the wrong tubes |
| Micah S. | |
| Glenn S. | Culberson was using it for a long time from Texas |
| Chris S. | Surely someone has figured out a version of "Rockin' Robin" that touts Twitter...? |
| Michael W. | I'm tweeting right now. Can you tell? |
| Andrew F. | Hey, didn't someone break that story LAST JULY?!? |
| Dean L. | Stevens was pre-tubescent |
| Andrew F. | I wonder who that was. |
| JoePlotkin | But can NYC save the $2 subway fare? |
| Judi C. | Twitter tag reminder: #ptc09 |
| Michael W. | Does it show? |
| AKMA A. | We know legislators tweet; we saw Claire McCaskill during Obama's address to Congress |
| christian A. | has entered the room |
| John S. | Note the bait and switch, with no admission that freepress does indeed make public its contributors. |
| Andrew F. | Oh yeah. Thanks. |
| Glenn S. | Culberson uses Seismic and other tools as well despite being very conservative |
| Sara W. | |
| David W. | OMG, judi's typo has forked our twitter! Disaster!!!! |
| Sara W. | dean+++ |
| Arnon K. | has left the room |
| Michael W. | The amazing thing about what Ellen is doing is that it is truly two way. She is careful to remove the intermediation. |
| AKMA A. | Judi: F2C09, n'est-ce pas? |
| Sara W. | david w: i cannot believe you are using such profanity. |
| David W. | open house url? |
| Michael W. | The federal government now leads nearly all state and local governments |
| Micah S. | that's one of our interns undergoing training |
| Paul H. | Twitter tags #f2c09 (some also using #f2c but 09 seems to be most "official) |
| David W. | wow, that photo is the _opposite_ of sunlight! |
| David W. | did you hear that too? |
| Micah S. | actually, it's an NFL ref do an instant replay check |
| Sara W. | it's just plain weird |
| shep | that time announcement was a few minutes late |
| Andrew F. | Open House project has not done anything to open up congress to new media |
| Sara W. | it's the lady with the pillow case over her head, actually |
| Dean L. | that was Big Brother (gender challenged) telling us what time it is |
| David W. | shep, that's because it came over wireless, not fiber. |
| Andrew F. | or even startups |
| Benoit F. | has left the room |
| Judi C. | sorry, yes, apparently f2c and f2c09 |
| Andrew F. | that recommendation has been completely ignored. |
| Michael W. | its a computer snuggie! |
| Dean L. | Judi: #F2C09 - remember the pound sign! |
| Brett G. | John
S: No bait and switch at all. FP refuses to reveal the portion of its
IRS Form 990 that lists all of the contributors and the amounts. Many
orgs will not willingly list contributors whose identities might be
embarrassing in a published report, but they MUST do so on Form 990. |
| Micah S. | Andrew
F.: please be more specific. Making it possible for Members of Congress
to use new media is a big shift. We want them to credential bloggers,
too, but that hasn't happened yet... |
| Jeff | Thanks, Ellen |
| Mar 30 | 11:05 AM |
| David W. | And yet, when it comes to guys in raincoats, it turns out that sunlight is NOT the best disinfectant, Go figure. |
| Mar 30 | 11:05 AM |
| Michael W. | Thank Elllen for giving you your country back |
| Michael W. | was that gubmint sausage? Now I get it! |
| Steve S. | hear hear for OWD |
| Dick C. | has entered the room |
| Harold F. | Yes, we get to see how it is being made. |
| Andrew F. | Micah: I'm not talking about bloggers |
| Micah S. | Now that Susan is working for the White House, we expect a big announcement of a new national holiday |
| Harold F. | Free plug for me: http://www.wetmachine.com/totsf |
| Paul W. | need more power outlets or a stimulus package for battery technology improvements |
| Micah S. | So, Andrew F, tell us what you're complaining about. |
| Andrew F. | I'm taking about the entire closed process that lets "old media" control who gets in |
| Joshua B. | digital literacy needs to include Internet policy |
| Brett G. | Andrew F: "Gets in" to what? |
| Joshua B. | and media production |
| Harold F. | Joshua B. I think you mean "Internet policy must include digital literacy" |
| Greg E. | has entered the room |
| Andrew F. | media credentials which allow access to hearings, markups, etc. |
| Michael W. | don't take the bait |
| Joshua B. | harold f. - that's also true |
| Lynn H. | you
can get copies of most 990's down at the foundation center. they have a
great database, but you have to hoof it to their office |
| Andrew F. | |
| Joshua B. | but
i mean that, when we teach people how to use the internet, we need to
teach how to add content to it and how to participate in the governance |
| Brett G. | Andrew F: There really is a credentialing problem. When everyone is a journalist, no one is. |
| Andrew F. | I won't go into the pitfalls of the term "citizen journalism" |
| Michael W. | deliver...pizza...it's all the same metaphor. Amzing |
| Andrew F. | but there has been zero progress on that point |
| Andrew F. | Brett: agreed. |
| Jeff | Journalism is the foundation of democracy, period |
| Andrew F. | but the system as it exists is TOTALLY opaque. |
| Andrew N. | has entered the room |
| harold g. | has entered the room |
| David Y. | Isn't journalism at risk? What's the business model? |
| David W. | ORCA, I like journalism, but I didn't find your "period" to be a convincing argument. |
| Andrew F. | hey, it's Andrew. |
| Brett G. | Why does there have to be ONE business model? |
| sean s. | has left the room |
| Ron C. | has entered the room |
| Jean R. | http://tfcny.fdncenter.org/990s/990search/… or guidestar for 990s |
| shep | where's the boundary between Journalism and not-Journalism ? |
| Mar 30 | 11:10 AM |
| Aleecia M. | There has to be at least one that works. |
| Marvin G. | has left the room |
| Jeff | Period of evolutionary change? Is that better? |
| David W. | Well, Brett, there has to be at least one. Isn't that the question? |
| Casey L. | journalism = an editor |
| David W. | journalism is miscellaneous[tm] |
| JoePlotkin | innovation always comes from outside |
| iz | casey: journalism=daily writing |
| Paul H. | Andrew:
Gov20Camp (last week) and Clubub working on opening up other social
media channels, maybe more focused on agencies but hill needs work too. |
| AKMA A. | Small journalists, loosely joined |
| Brett G. | If
diversity is the best strategy, why are so many lobbyists trying to
kill diversity in Internet business models -- including the ways that
carriers price and position their services? |
| Jen G. | Huffington
investigative initiative, 1.75 million for starters... journalism
(particularly investigative) will be predominantly foundation-funded
within 5 years. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huff… Love the examples of journalists getting laid off and starting 501c3s. |
| David I. | has entered the room |
| Andrew F. | casey: it's a process that involves getting the story "right." |
| Tony A. | journalism
is turning data into useful information. non-journalism is transcripts
of meetings. OTOH, just having transcripts of meetings at all levels of
govt. (including local) would go a long way towards enabling
journalists to find what to distill down. |
| Brett G. | If journalism goes nonprofit, then corporations will control it completely via "donations." |
| iz | if
you look at the actual source of the word, the first journalists must
have been writing diaries... they were bloggers, essentially |
| Aleecia M. | as opposed to controlling v. ad placement? |
| Michael W. | don't take the bait |
| Shawn W. | has left the room |
| shep | Casey L -- I'm not so sure "journalism = an editor" is helpful. |
| David W. | yes, andrew f, but there's a prior question about the viability of the notion of "the story." |
| Glenn S. | Breaking
News - President Obama: It is a failure of leadership, from Washington
to Detroit, that led our auto companies to this point. |
| Jessyca H. | has entered the room |
| Joshua B. | tony
A. - only if those transcripts are in xml, not pdf, and the
announcements of meetings and publication or transcripts are announced
by email and RSS |
| isen | has entered the room |
| isen | Questions from outside the room? |
| Dick C. | has left the room |
| David I. | How "one turns data into useful information" is the key issue. |
| isen | David I -- is that the military analyst David I? |
| isen | :-) |
| Casey L. | the
role of an editor is the only thing that comes to mind that
distinguishes the "professional journalist" class from the unwashed
bloggers. (with all due respect and affection for the unwashed bloggers) |
| David I. | There
has to be a certain willigness to do more than conversion from one to
the other. A certain added value must happen by dint of the reporter's
willigness to see and fill in gaps. |
| David S. | has left the room |
| Hilarie C. | has left the room |
| Jessyca H. | has left the room |
| David I. | Yes, writing from Oslo. |
| Jen G. | Data
into "useful" information (as in, one of the scariest things you'll
see. Growth of Walmart in America, visualized over time-space
continuum: http://projects.flowingdata.com/walmart/ |
| Tony A. | Joshua:
XML is not a panacea. I wouldn't trust most governments to tag it
correctly (other than the date, time and title of the meeting). PDF can
be crawled and indexed. Audio can be machine-transcribed very well,
often to the individual speakers. |
| isen | Cool -- hello David I |
| Andrew F. | Casey: it's the process, not the hiararchy |
| David Y. | How do we connect the 25% or so of households without a PC (or whose PC is so ancient as to be unusable for broadband)? |
| Mar 30 | 11:15 AM |
| Aleecia M. | "digital resistance" is an interesting phrase. I'm not surprised people are seeing this. |
| isen | Good Q David Y |
| Dan G. | has entered the room |
| David Y. | Are devices like the iPod Touch part of the answer? |
| David I. | Well, no, Casey. The reporter brings certain skills to the job, than editor may not have, and a blogger usually does not. |
| Brett G. | Aleecia:
You can only buy so many ads, but you can pay a lot more in bribes.
Instead of buying a few more ads, they'll pour in many millions in
"contributions" -- all tax-deductible to boot! |
| Casey L. | but
iz - I agree the origin of the term is a crucial part. There are entire
conferences dedicated the question. It's a tough one. |
| Jen G. | Xbox can be better hardware for some households. |
| Nicholas M. | has entered the room |
| Joshua B. | nathan, i agree with that |
| David Y. | true |
| Paul H. | As
for-profit journalism faces more pressure to "sell its soul" to
survive, perhaps more multi-modal funding available to nonprofits could
lead to truer independence |
| Sara W. | has left the room |
| Steve S. | some
low income women at CrittentonWomensUnion were profiled in the Boston
Globe and got some negative hate mail on the articles commentary, it
was pretty traumatic for them |
| Brett G. | Not
all reporters bring such great skills to the job, as almost anyone who
has ever been interviewed for a newspaper article can attest. |
| Robb T. | has entered the room |
| AKMA A. | Libraries offer a tremendous opportunity for public connectivity -- don't neglect the librarians! |
| Jeff | Paul H.: See Jen G.'s link from Huffington |
| David W. | Yes, Akma. Especially once those libraries have a SINGLE FRICKING TERMINAL to access e-books, via the Google Books settlement. |
| David I. | Actually,
journalism has been experiments with non-pfofir models. Pro Publica is
one of them. And Brian Bender of the Boston Globe recently set up a
site for foreign affairs reporting. |
| Tony A. | DavidY:
Getting those households PCs is only a small part of the problem. You
still have to get those people affordable connectivity. If they don't
have a PC yet, I expect they don't want to spend $30/month for access. |
| Andrew F. | The vast majority of journalists I know (in the small corner of the world I cover) are very, very good. |
| Brett G. | There is a big vacuum out here on the Internet; everyone's in there. |
| Tom V. | has entered the room |
| Doc S. | Interesting that some journals survive (if not thrive) on subscriptions. http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2009/03/2… |
| Russell S. | has left the room |
| Aleecia M. | There
is a push to wire Rwanda with the belief that the Internet will help
bring people together. And I'm thinking: have you ever seen a flame
war? |
| David I. | Brett,
no profession is perfect. Your point could just as well be made about
members of Congress, for example, but at least in the print realm there
are mroe good ones than bad ones. |
| Glenn S. | Tony
A - in the developing world people will buy an expensive computer
because they know it will change the future for their children and then
they need connectivity. |
| Harold F. | What's the link for live stream? |
| Brett G. | Congress is still beholden to special interests; they're just different special interests. |
| Andrew F. | I see at least two in the chat room that I'd probably hire before I hired myself. |
| David Y. | Tony
A, most of the studies I've seen (Pew Internet, eg) show that cost of
broadband is not the primary reason that people don't have PCs or
Internet access. |
| Joshua B. | Tony
A - I think this is what Mark Cooper was saying - So many more people
are already paying for a mobile device and service, if we can improve
that we can make important strides towards expanding access. |
| Dean L. | Harold: rtsp://odo.warpspeed.com/f2c09.sdp |
| Glenn S. | Aleecia
M. Having worked in the region, especially Uganda and Kenya and Rwanda,
they are using connectivity to make major changes in government
deployment of services. |
| shep | Wow, we have two different David Isenbergs. See http://isen.com/blog/2004/02/other-david-i… |
| Harold F. | David Y: It's a complex equation. Cost is one factor, but it is more accurate to say "value" is the issue. |
| Brett G. | Fortunately,
most of the members of Congress understand that so-called "network
neutrality" legislation isn't "neutral" at all; it favors certain
corporations over others and would be extremely destructive. |
| Harold F. | Show me it's worth the price. |
| David Y. | I'm
sure there are some for whom broadband cost is a barrier, and for those
cases, perhaps an end-user subsidy of some sort makes sense |
| David W. | This is a Spartacus moment: _I_ am Isenberg! |
| Mar 30 | 11:20 AM |
| Aleecia M. | Glenn
S: I'd love to see "how to communicate over the 'net" as something
taught. How to be civil, basically. And build it in from the start. |
| Mar 30 | 11:20 AM |
| Ken B. | has left the room |
| Harold F. | But the question of cost informs value for many people. |
| JoePlotkin | I hate to admit this - I agree with BrettG |
| David Y. | Harold F, yes, "I don't see the value" is a common response |
| Harold F. | Even if they don't say "it cost too much." The phrase" it's not worth it" is informed by cost. |
| Brett G. | We find that broadband cost is a minor barrier. Not WANTING to be on the Net is actually a bigger one. |
| Judi C. | Harold, must use Quicktime. If your system starts up Real Player, the stream won't work (different rtsp protocols) |
| Marvin G. | has entered the room |
| AKMA A. | Again, public users with library access are a powerful fulcrum |
| Micah S. | Yes, Rs Tweet 2x at rate of Ds. Mainly because they have nothing else to do. |
| Joshua B. | aleecia M. - journalism (the history, practice, and ethics) should be taught in schools grades 6-12 |
| SLW | has entered the room |
| Dean L. | Harold: VLC player (opens ource, all platforms) works like a charm |
| Harold F. | Yes, public users in libraries and elsewhere are important. Just ask folks on "cyber Monday." |
| Judi C. | audio stream from iTunes: http://odo.warpspeed.com:8000/f2c09.mp3 |
| AKMA A. | "Ownership" of PCs and broadband not the only path |
| Andrew F. | @ Micah what does that say about some of us? ;-) |
| David Y. | Library access is a great way to expose people to the value of broadband |
| Harold F. | I just want to repost the link for followers on twitter. |
| Glenn S. | Aleecia S - my work in Macedonia was done to generate greater connectivity between the two polarised ethnic populations. |
| Aleecia M. | http://www.thebeehive.org/ -- one attempt to make the Internet useful to low-income citizens |
| Micah S. | I can't answer that question, Andrew R., I'm too busy tweeting. |
| Lynn H. | David
Y - this is critical. especially as you see schools moving to homework
that must be done online and projects that are reliant on the internet.
for those who don't have computers at home, they're already penalized.
the schools have limited computers for use after hours and here in SS
the average wait for a computer at the library is 2+ hours. |
| Aleecia M. | Joshua B: that would be interesting |
| Andrew F. | You could always just DM the answer ;-) |
| Aleecia M. | Glenn
S: how's that working? I can imagine it working well or horribly. It
seems like the sort of thing that requires some thought and care. |
| David I. | I
don't think access to the online world in and of itself is nearly
enough. There has to be access to quality data sources also. What I
would like to see is people having access to the sort of databases that
the average college university student has in their library. |
| Fred H. | has entered the room |
| David Y. | Lynn
H, you are right. Actually, many who don't have computers now do say
that they will go online when their kids start school. Most parents
recognize that broadband access IS important for their kids. |
| Glenn S. | Aleecia M - Would love to tell you all about it. You can view some of it at glennstrachancv.blogspot.com |
| Andrew F. | @ David I -- that could be possible if they didnt cost so much |
| David W. | David I: This is one more reason we ought to be paying tremendous attention to the Google Book settlement. |
| Aleecia M. | Thanks! |
| Andrew F. | CQ $2k MINIMUM per person per year |
| Stig | has left the room |
| Brian K. | has left the room |
| Brian W. | has left the room |
| harold g. | has left the room |
| AKMA A. | We
should be applying pressure not only via Google Books settlement, but
also via value-adding Creative Commons and out-of-copyright materials |
| Mar 30 | 11:25 AM |
| Doc S. | I'm
with Joe and Brett on NN legislation, but only in questioning if it's
necessary. (In other words, I like it as a principle, but worry about
burning it into law, especially when up against giant lobbying machines
that live to widen loopholes.) Michael Powell's remarks here three
years ago still apply. I quoted him at some length here: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8979 |
| shep | at least television is less dominant today than it was in previous years or decades. |
| JoePlotkin | Doc, I just wish we could restore common carriage |
| David I. | Well,
the Google book settlment is important, and there were some recent back
and forth exchanges on that in the NY Review of Books, but I am moe
concerned about things like Lexis-Nexis, WorldCat, FBIS (now Dialog),
Project Muse, Scopus,... |
| tim | has left the room |
| David W. | Yes,
AKMA, but the goog settlement will effectively give goog a monopoly (or
at least a tremendous market position) on distribution of scanned
materials, in and out of copyright. Cf special deal with Sony to
distributed copyright-free books. |
| David Y. | If you haven's looked at Pew's research, you should - http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/Ge… |
| AKMA A. | All of the above -- yes, yes |
| David W. | David
I, yes, Rbt Darnton on the goog settlement in NYRB is seminal. And, we
can of course multitask our fears, and worry about all these things
simultaneously. |
| JoePlotkin | I also fear that NN regs would be impossible to enforce |
| David W. | [David W goes for a virtual drink] |
| Shaun D. | has entered the room |
| Doc S. | TV is a dead concept walking. http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/what-h… |
| Aleecia M. | David
I: when I (finally) graduate from CMU (again), I'm going to miss the
library's VPN the most. Free access to most journals is a huge win. But
I don't see that going free any time soon. |
| Jeff | I've fallen and I can't get up! |
| Chris S. | Joe,
re: NN "regs" -- NN is not a set of rules. It is simply a principle
akin to those already long-established in communications law: the
obligation to be "reasonable" and "non-discriminatory." Precisely what
those terms mean can only be filled in on a case-by-case basis. |
| Glenn S. | I've fallen and I need to Twitter that! |
| AKMA A. | Aye,
access to academic databases tremendously important -- we can help
leverage access to extant dbs by working on routing around them at the
same time |
| David I. | I'd
even be pleased if Google Scholar was more widely used, though it could
use some more work. Try finding the date of publication on many of the
result, for example. Or try finding the name of a book, in which an
individual chapter pops usp. |
| Doc S. | I'm a senior editor. Would this program be good for me? |
| Rafael D. | has entered the room |
| Chris S. | Doc -- It depends... are you still "hip"? |
| Nathaniel J. | has entered the room |
| JoePlotkin | Chris,
as u know the telecom act wasnt enforced - and those were physical
loops (and othe unes) How will they find 100ms of latency? |
| Mar 30 | 11:30 AM |
| Andrew F. | Doc: I am glad LJ still exists. Was my first byline many years ago. |
| Mar 30 | 11:30 AM |
| AKMA A. | I thoink Doc looks better than the box |
| Brett G. | "Case
by case basis" is really scary; you don't know you've violated
something until you're punished. Violates due process, as the Comcast
ruling did. |
| Chris S. | Joe, there's no substitute for having people with a motivation to enforce the law. |
| Glenn S. | USAID
is sponsoring Telemed activities along with PEPFAR in Kenya and Rwanda
and will eventually be found in 11 countries throughout Africa. PEPFAR
is monitoring HIV/AIDS activities. |
| Doc S. | I'll try to stay out of the box for as long as possible. |
| Erik C. | Chris S. there's no substitute for lots of law to enforce. |
| Justin H. | has entered the room |
| Erik C. | <g> |
| Brett G. | The Brady Bunch |
| Chris S. | Brett
-- it doesn't violate due process if you get process during the
proceeding. Agencies in general (including the FCC) know how to have
adjudicatory proceedings. |
| Jim Y. | has entered the room |
| Jeff | Many in Vermont don't have TV |
| Michael W. | Doc, i heard you say at Berkman you have FIOS. How many customer in WA do you think they have? |
| Andrew F. | Brett: problem with FCC is it's not actually bound by precedent. |
| JoePlotkin | We had plenty of people upset when false "no facilities" from Vz |
| David W. | Suppose we get 4 people in a box. Could it then handle 48 people? How about if we compress the people? |
| Brent S. | has left the room |
| Brett G. | Even "adjudicatory" proceedings have to start with rules or laws. They can't make up regulations out of whole cloth. |
| Chris S. | Andrew: Actually, it is, although not quite as much as a court. they can change their mind but they have to explain why. |
| Andrew F. | they can reverse themselves as long as they can justify it under the APA |
| Jeff | Advantage of FCC is "it's not actually bound by precedent." |
| Michael W. | FCC doesn't use the APA except in a very narrow set of proceedings |
| Doc S. | Michael,
hate to say I don't know all the places where FiOS is. It's not in
Cambridge, but is in Newton, Arlington and some other places. Red Bank,
NJ. I think it has to do with easy access and maximizing the number of
drops per mile. |
| Andrew F. | Chris: right. it can't be arbitrary or caprecious |
| Chris S. | Brett:
Right, agreed. The interesting (to me) legal question in the Comcast
case is whether the FCC actually has jurisdiction under today's law
over the whole NN thing. |
| Andrew F. | No, but it's technically bound by APA. |
| Tom V. | re
Doc's assertion that TV is dead, anyone know of any studies comparing
the lengths of the "long tail" in metered & scarcity-priced vs.
flat-rate, high bandwidth markets? |
| Harold F. | Chris S. We'll find out soon enough. |
| Andrew F. | (to Michael W) |
| Brett G. | Chris:
That's a good question. Federal law says that the Internet should be
"unfettetered by Federal or state regulation." The FCC tried to
override that. |
| Jeff | Then who would have jurisdiction over NN? |
| Brett G. | Congress, if it so chose. |
| Chris S. | Brett: Right. But the same federal law also says the FCC has jurisdiction over all "communications by wire or radio." |
| Doc S. | I
agree with Brett that the FCC may have overstepped legally. *May* have.
Don't really know. But the decision didn't feel right to me, even
though I lose no love on a company that botched its case in front of
the FCC royally. |
| Harold F. | If TV is dead, why did we just have a huge to do over the DTV transition? |
| Andrew F. | Chris: of course IANAL but my vegas bookie says dont bet on the FCC in the CAFC |
| Mar 30 | 11:35 AM |
| Tony A. | Because some people with analog TV are also voters. :-) |
| Brett G. | The case will likely come to court this summer, and Harold F is likely to be involved |
| Harold F. | Hint, not because of frustrated LTE users. |
| Harold F. | I am involved. |
| Harold F. | Although my role has changed. |
| Doc S. | The
DTV transition already happened when nearly everybody went to cable and
satellite, and the remaining sum of over-the-air watchers equaled the
number of CB radio users. All the rest is politics vs. engineering and
the latter lost. |
| Fred J. | has left the room |
| Andrew N. | has left the room |
| Harold F. | My former colleagues at MAP are now representing Petitioners Vuze, CU, and PennPirg. |
| Jeff | Joe Bookchin's Mom? |
| Harold F. | I am now representing intervenor PK. |
| David W. | Here's an embarrassingly IANAL question: Couldn't the FCC decide to reclassify the Title the Net is under? |
| Andrew F. | David: no |
| Dirk | has left the room |
| Philip R. | has entered the room |
| DirkvanderWoude | has entered the room |
| Harold F. | Yes, but it would need to explain why it changed it's mind. |
| David W. | Andrew F: Why not? |
| Chris S. | If the court says the FCC has no jurisdiction over NN, what do you think Congress would do? |
| Harold F. | That would be very hard. |
| iz | should we all be doing this? |
| iz | I challenge you to stand up |
| Harold F. | I think it is very difficult for this Congress to do nothing if the DC Cir finds no jurisdicion. |
| Glenn S. | Can we do this using our EVDO router from our car? |
| Stig | has entered the room |
| David W. | Worst. Webcam. Ever. |
| Brett G. | It's sad that a PIRG got in on the wrong side of that case. Comcast was trying to preserve quality of service for consuyemrs. |
| David W. | :) |
| Micah S. | Anybody find a url showing Telecare for Rural Health Project in action??? |
| Chris S. | Harold,
can you articulate why a transmission from my computer to a URL, and
then a transmission of the requested files back to me, fails to meet
the definition of "telecommunications" in the Act? |
| Geoff D. | has left the room |
| Robb T. | has left the room |
| Andrew F. | Harold F: is your brief available online? |
| Jeff | "Comcast was trying to preserve quality of service for consuyemrs." OMG... ROTFL |
| AKMA A. | I evidently don't check out as many webcams as David W |
| Micah S. | I love this. |
| Harold F. | According to the S.Ct., the FCC could so decide. |
| iz | why am I the only one doing this? get up people! |
| JoePlotkin | Micah me too |
| Harold F. | Apparently, because of DNs. |
| Steve S. | I'm imagining this built in as a WII app, with the camera auto recognizing motions |
| Steve S. | and moving avatars |
| Chris S. | I'm not asking what the existing precedent might say. E.g., can you distinguish DNS from the 800 database? |
| Harold F. | iz I would hit the people on either side of me. |
| Harold F. | No. That's why I argued for Title II. |
| Brett G. | Sorry
for the typo. In any event, that's what the Comcast engineers were up
to. And the proof of this is that management didn't even understand it;
that's why they bungled the PR |
| iz | h - not if they were also bending at the same time! |
| Steve S. | that's why it would be great if some of those gameing platforms would open up more |
| Jen G. | Next up, massive multiplayer Dance Dance Revolution for seniors. |
| Joshua B. | is there a url for this project? |
| Aleecia M. | Please
explain your proof that somehow the execs managed to have no idea how
their network works, despite knowing they were going in front of
congress to talk about it. |
| Mar 30 | 11:40 AM |
| iz | it is a proven fact that exercise makes you younger |
| Mar 30 | 11:40 AM |
| Jeff | Sorry, Brett. Not a comment on the typo. |
| JoePlotkin | Tim Nulty, does this run on your fiuber net? |
| Steve S. | there's a (growing) market for MMOs aimed at seniors, and bringing physical activity into it is a natural direction |
| JoePlotkin | fiber |
| Aleecia M. | Last time, Brett, you were posing that as conjecture. This year you have proof? Bring it. |
| Harold F. | This application is very cool. I can see many useful applications in other situations. |
| Harold F. | Although I am having a bad 1984 flashback. |
| David W. | Seniors need more fiber. |
| JoePlotkin | 2-way video = the killer app |
| iz | those old folks have some serious indigestion |
| Steve S. | noise on the vent channel |
| AKMA A. | Or wireless, or wireless, they're synergistic |
| Dean L. | they need to exercise their fiber |
| Micah S. | David W +++ wins prize for best WTF themed snark-pun |
| iz | hh dean |
| JoePlotkin | i knew someone would make the fiber joke |
| Harold F. | The part where Winston is doing the exercise show and the instructor calls him out for doing it wrong. |
| Harold F. | Disturbing question: How do I know when the connection is off? |
| Jeff | Got fiber? |
| David W. | And yet, Joe, you restrained yourself. What are you, an adult? |
| AKMA A. | Exercise online = double-plus good |
| SLW | There is a research paper on the project: http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.10… |
| Harold F. | Can the feds turn it on? With a warrant, of course.... |
| JoePlotkin | David W - no just pacing myself |
| Doc S. | Brett,
they also bungled the PR by packing the Ames Courtroom with street
people. It was even more weird than it was dumb. Right up there with
those car maker CEOs flying corporate jets to Congress when they went
begging for $billions. |
| Steve S. | many MMO technologies could be repurposed here |
| Stig | Yes, remote telehealth. VA piloting nicely. |
| Dean L. | virtual visiting nurse? |
| iz | dean, she has the cure for what ails you. |
| Brett G. | Aleecia:
I talked to folks at Comcast immediately after the case was filed. Both
ther PR people and upper management were, frankly, clueless about the
entire concept of traffic management. It was being done by the
engineers. Which makes sense; it's a best practice in the industry. |
| Steve S. | Second Life yoga classes? |
| Dan G. | Brilliant experiment (rural telemedicine) -- we need a million more experiments of various kinds. |
| Tony A. | Can we do this without the application specific box? Can the box be opened for other VC purposes? |
| Jim Y. | has left the room |
| iz | if it doesn't just work on a regular tv, why don't they just use skype? |
| AKMA A. | Steve -- changes the whole game mechanics of Warcraft |
| JoePlotkin | TonyA - sure, but this shows innovation that is only possible with broadband connections |
| Steve S. | tony a, it does beg for an open platform doesn't it. The t'ai chi class should be just one of many apps |
| Dean L. | Iz; skype might be blocked by certain systems |
| Brett G. | Doc: I haven't been able to get a straight answer about the people in the courtroom. But they seem to have been line holders. |
| Mar 30 | 11:45 AM |
| Jeff | Eva origins... http://deadbeatdirt.blogspot.com/ |
| JoePlotkin | expands our constituencies beyond this room |
| Michael W. | I do all my yoga on Second Life. Its great, and I don't get sweaty. |
| Brett G. | One of the things that we started doing at our inception was telemedicine. |
| David W. | spell eva's last name please someone? |
| AKMA A. | Sollberger |
| Steve S. | akma
i've been paying some attention to camera-tracking of movements lately,
projecting the tech forward 5 - 10 years there's going to be some very
interesting possiblies for new input modalities |
| Dean L. | Eva Sollberger, Stuck in Vermont Video Blog |
| Doc S. | |
| Aleecia M. | Brett,
if you start with the assumption Comcast is lily white, perhaps "we
assert we're honest" is persuasive. If you start from the assumption
they are not, it is not. |
| Steve S. | ... and I'm sure things like WoW will drive adoption |
| Doc S. | |
| Tony A. | Joe: Yes. And it works best on a connection which does not throttle your upstream traffic. |
| JoePlotkin | upstream is where the action is! |
| AKMA A. | Steve -- glad we're casters; I'd hate to have to be a prot warrior |
| Justin H. | there's also some interesting things developing with augmented reality |
| isen | That's STUCK IN VERMONT |
| Steve S. | :) |
| Michael W. | don't get a big head |
| Brett G. | A newspaper with video: "The Quibbler" in Harry Potter |
| JoePlotkin | the internet is PARTICIPATORY |
| Dean L. | 1% growth in 08 -- that beats the NY Times! |
| iz | "stuck in vermont" does not exactly convey the message of a whole bunch of "kids" who are "happy" to stay in state |
| Chris S. | iz, don't you get irony? <g> |
| Justin H. | it's "ironical" |
| iz | hh chris |
| AKMA A. | Eva exemplifies the right track; Doc S. "making money not ON the internet, but BESIDE the internet" |
| JoePlotkin | Steve- we assume WoW gets it -- this is about AARP too |
| isen | You gotta watch a few "Stuck in VT" vids to get the picture |
| Chris S. | Although maybe it has something to do with the taffy, earlier... |
| Dean L. | no,not the taffy...up there it is the maple syrup |
| Chris S. | Still sticky, though... |
| Jeff | We used to practice irony in Vermont, nobody understood so we stopped. |
| Doc S. | Speedtest: http://speedtest.vonage.com
(it's the best). Says 15.092Mb downstream, 34.626Mb upstream. Wireless
(at least upstream) faster than my fiber at home. Just saying. |
| David W. | New tagline: "Vermont: As Ironic as Howard Dean." |
| Mar 30 | 11:50 AM |
| Dean L. | Green Mountain Irony...sounds like a brand of coffee |
| AKMA A. | Still some outposts of irony in VT -- my son goes to Marlboro |
| isen | What is a Derby Dame? |
| Justin H. | I'm thinking roller derby |
| David W. | I think it's ladies in hats. No? |
| JoePlotkin | Roller Derby rules! |
| Brett G. | Doc: 802.11g or b? |
| Brett G. | Or a? |
| Judi C. | We're running B, G, and N |
| Chris S. | Doc: Heh. Per that site, we've got about 18 down/17 up right here. |
| Doc S. | dunno. I'm guessing g. Maybe somebody in the room knows. Judi? Dewayne? |
| Doc S. | Chris, where is here? |
| Brett G. | It's good that the b isn't slowing it down too much. |
| Ken B. | has entered the room |
| Tony A. | Roller Derby in horse set hats. That would be tricky. |
| Ken B. | Actually 5 GHz 802.11n |
| Dean L. | Tom Metzner gets some national attn |
| Dean L. | he's a hoot |
| AKMA A. | Alison Bechdel FTW |
| Chris S. | Doc, "here" is sitting by the door next to Dean L |
| David W. | If they pull back far enough, will we see elders in leotards? |
| Aleecia M. | kite surfing in VT: brrrr |
| Justin H. | Chanel did a campaign with ladies in brown derbies last year, I think |
| Dean L. | I rent that seat by the session |
| Ken B. | I want the patent on those broomsticks |
| Doc S. | Does Middlebury Quiddich involve fling on brooms? |
| AKMA A. | David, you're stuck on those Tai Chi webcams |
| Brett G. | I want a snitch |
| Lynn H. | So in VT, they've learned how to make brooms fly |
| David W. | I will never forget the web cams, AKMA. For I am one of them. |
| Justin H. | I think Vermont is just bragging about their rich hipster subculture. |
| Brough T. | And, if everyone in the room tries a speedtest at the same time..., your result may vary. |
| Dean L. | Peter King/Tiny Houses,not to be confused with Don Ho |
| Chris S. | 4, 3, 2, 1.... |
| Michael W. | very vermont... is that like Northwest Smug? |
| iz | it's a pyramid scheme |
| David W. | C'mon! Let's all flush the superbowl bit toilet at once! |
| Paul H. | Is the video hooked up to screen, or is that just a cool screensaver. |
| Brett G. | Henry David Thoreau |
| Michael W. | a phone? yer kidding right? |
| John S. | |
| Justin H. | it's an IRONIC screensaver |
| Michael W. | we're talking tiny |
| Stig | Now he has a mega-mansion? |
| Michael W. | the tinyiest guy in the world |
| Mar 30 | 11:55 AM |
| Dean L. | an ironic,if tiny, video |
| Michael W. | that's small |
| David W. | My screensaver reeks of sincerity. Really.. |
| Dean L. | are his permalinks tinyurls? |
| Michael W. | the tiny movement |
| JoePlotkin | Didnt John Cougar sing about this in the 80s? |
| Michael W. | he lives in tinytown |
| David W. | OMG, she's 22 and giving us an Old Fogey moment! |
| Justin H. | at least they aren't ticky tacky houses |
| Michael W. | as long as its tiny |
| JoePlotkin | OMG its the Internets! |
| David W. | I protest on behalf of all old fogeys everywhere! |
| David W. | :) |
| Jeff | Doctors and Lawyers and Internet Executives |
| Micah S. | show not tell, show not tell, show not tell |
| Steve S. | let's not forget the tiny that started it all, tinyMUD |
| Jeff | Intertubes |
| Chris S. | No, it was somebody else (Joni Mitchell?) who did ticky-tacky. Mellencamp did pink |
| Michael W. | Micah, chill its coming |
| JoePlotkin | cue the Randy Newman song |
| Michael W. | its tiny |
| Brett G. | It's an itsy bitsy teeny weeny ticky tacky... oh, never mind |
| David W. | we should be hearing The Voice telling us it's 12:00 very soon... |
| Erik C. | we're stuck in tiny |
| Erik C. | Joyce the Voice |
| Michael W. | soooooo vermont |
| Harold F. | Stuck in VT? Reminds me of Arrogant Worm's "Ottawa Sucks." |
| Dean L. | WPTZ?! Putz radio? |
| Jeff | Carrot Juice is Murder |
| Michael W. | barista, carpentry, massage therapist, land use lawyer |
| Harold F. | Whoo hooo! Arrogant Worms rock!!!! |
| Justin H. | we have problems with too many people coming to South Carolina; we need the anti-this |
| Jeff | Unwashed Bloggers? |
| Steve S. | Justin ... "Get out of South Carolina" ? |
| AKMA A. | "Little Boxes" is a song written by Malvina Reynolds in 1962 |
| Chris S. | ORCAMedia: Great name for a band. |
| Brett G. | Just do videos of Hilton Head, where you can only paint your house one of two or three colors.... |
| Michael W. | its huge..... but its tiny, too |
| Benoit F. | has entered the room |
| David W. | New tagline: "South Carolina: Lovers stay the f*ck home!" |
| Michael W. | there tiny |
| Erik C. | tiny tech - it's so small you don't know it's there, but it's there |
| Mar 30 | 12:00 PM |
| fpaynter | RT @writinghannah Last man standing takes all. And by man I mean kitten. And by standing I mean lying down. http://tinyurl.com/ae6fz5 |
| Chris S. | Erik -- I think that's called "biotech..." |
| JoePlotkin | tiny bits? |
| Justin H. | "Smiling Faces, Beautiful Places, but they're ours so Stay the Hell Away!" |
| Steve S. | is tiny smaller than nano? |
| Glenn S. | This is why rural populations need broadband solutions |
| Brett G. | Nano |
| Justin H. | amen Glenn |
| Michael W. | tiny is its own thing |
| Jeff | Micro=small, Soft=Not Hard |
| Chris S. | I hope tiny isn't smaller than nano. OTOH somebody should create "nanoURL"... |
| Glenn S. | USAID
understands the relationship between broadband and economic development
and hopefully that message is finally catching here in the USA |
| Aleecia M. | Pittsburgh could use something like this |
| Brett G. | We're
doing it. This year, so far, we have deployed broadband to an area of
Wyoming 5 times the size of Manhattan (with a much smaller population,
alas) |
| AKMA A. | VT has brain magnet |
| Steve S. | quick Chris, grab the domain ... |
| JoePlotkin | New slogan: Burlington - not a 2-bit town anymore! |
| Steve S. | :) |
| Doc S. | Vermont. It's like New Hampshire, only upside down. |
| Chris S. | Yeah, but that's Pittsburgh, not Vermont... <g> |
| Glenn S. | I get paid to help countries understand this relationship yet I have trouble telling that same story in the USA |
| Andrew F. | Anyone have a video stream link? |
| Tom V. | Glenn, how is USAID expressing that understanding? |
| David W. | "Vermont: I've got a pile of resumes" |
| Jeff | Vermont... It's not that bad! |
| Chris S. | Steve: I grant it to the commons here... |
| Erik C. | VT's answer to Hotel California -- come here, do "tiny", and stay forever. |
| Tony A. | Pittsburgh is almost as cold as VT, but the snow is dirtier. |
| David W. | "Vermont: Now it's a brand" |
| saschameinrath | has left the room |
| Justin H. | Eva really is a treasure to her state |
| Genny P. | has left the room |
| Shaun D. | has left the room |
| Joe G. | has entered the room |
| JoePlotkin | Vt: high tech AND nice leaves |
| Glenn S. | USAID
expresses it through the support for broadband activities around the
world - Senegal, Macedonia, Montengro and many other countries |
| Aleecia M. | Speaking of needing to market! Pittsburgh is pretty clean, now that the steal industry is dead.dead.dead |
| Michael W. | typical vermonter |
| Erik C. | It's the quality of hats ... |
| David W. | They also want more cheek blush apparently |
| Stig | youtube link to this video anybody? |
| Michael W. | like that vermont accent |
| Aleecia M. | steel, too. |
| Chris S. | In fairness I like Pittsburgh. |
| Jeff | Isn't USAID a cover for the CIA? |
| Harold F. | VT, because you can go to Canada for your drugs. |
| Glenn S. |
|
| Dean L. | that last woman on the video: a Vermonter with a Southern accent? |
| Chris S. | ORCA-- only outside the US. here it's a front for the FBI... <g> |
| Glenn S. | I am not a shill for the CIA |
| Jeff | All vids here deadbeatdirt.blogspot.com/ |
| Micah S. | Just posted this on the Vermont telecare project: http://techpresident.com/blog-entry/broadb… |
| Doc S. | Ava, just spell David's name "Eisenberg." |
| Jeff | It's just what I heard |
| Dean L. | Doc ++ |
| Chris S. | ORCA: seriously: the CIA plants people in lots of places. But most of the people in those places aren't CIA. |
| Tom V. | Glenn, do you have any pointers to said USAID activity? |
| Doc S. | Maybe David gave Ava his missing E. |
| Andrew F. | i meant the live stream |
| Harold F. | Damn them! |
| Andrew F. | eh i'll ask around. |
| Harold F. | Very cheerful. |
| Andrew F. | signing off. |
| Mar 30 | 12:05 PM |
| JoePlotkin | Is there a copyleft panel at F2C? |
| Chris S. | Time for lunch... |
| fpaynter | CIA is all outsourced these days. Not many spook feds anymore |
| Glenn S. | Tom V. - see http://glennstrachancv.blogspot.com/ |
| AKMA A. | Should be |
| Brett G. | Gno. |
| Doc S. | Don't eat right away. Dig these musicians. Really. They're awesome. |
| Chris S. | fpaynter - Or so they'd like you to believe... |
| Jeff | Spook feds have all moved to Vermont |
| David W. | backchannel about to become the stomach channel. |
| Doc S. | All the lazy spooks just spy on themselves. |
| Glenn S. | DC is where the spooks live!! |
| David W. | I'll say it again: the music is PHENOMENAL |
| fpaynter | doc + |
| Tom V. | re:
optimism regarding virtuous cycles b/w foreign policy and domestic
policy... anything is possible I guess, but if there is any "usual"
pattern, that's not it |
| Alex G. | iz |
| Jeff | Bon appetit |
| Chris S. | Doc -- would that be onanistic espionage? |
| AKMA A. | John Jorenson Quintert tops already great history of music at F2c |
| Tom V. | e.g., aggressive advocacy for (foreign) market openness to new entrants in telecom |
| Jeff | God helps those who help themselves |
| David W. | onanastic espionage: One hand DOES know what the other is doing. |
| Brett G. | Have they ever had Jonathan Coulton? |
| Nicholas M. | has left the room |
| JoePlotkin | Spy could go blind that way! |
| Steve S. | heading to Kefa Cafe http://www.silverspringdowntown.com/go/kefa-cafe after I eat in case anyone wants to join me find me in the hallway |
| Chris S. | Anyone know of the Coldstone Creamery around here is still open? |
| Stig | Kefa+ Great off-Ellsworth place! |
| JoePlotkin | Chris there is a Ben and Jerrys around the corner |
| Don J. | ChrisS: I saw it when I was walking around last night, the sign, didn't look in the window |
| Chris S. | Cool |
| Stig | Just turn right where the astroturf used to be. |
| Mar 30 | 12:10 PM |
| Garret S. | has left the room |
| Dan A. | has left the room |
| David I. | has left the room |
| Ken B. | has left the room |
| Ron C. | has left the room |
| Rafael D. | has left the room |
| DirkvanderWoude | has left the room |
| Tom V. | I
wonder what USTR would say if (foreign market counterpart X) suggested
that, in order to enter X's telecom market, all aspiring US entrant Z
has to do is build a completely new/parallel but independent telecom
facilities platform |
| Tom V. | ...and declare that to be "open and vibrantly competitive" ;-) |
| Lynn H. | has left the room |
| Shmuel F. | has left the room |
| Michael W. | has left the room |
| Nathaniel J. | has left the room |
| Joe G. | has left the room |
| Mar 30 | 12:15 PM |
| Alice J. | has entered the room |
| Erik C. | has left the room |
| Jen G. | has left the room |
| shep | has left the room |
| Andrew F. | has left the room |
| Harold F. | has left the room |
| Aleecia M. | has left the room |
| Dan G. | has left the room |
| Marvin G. | has left the room |
| Judi C. | Video and audio broadcast going down for lunch. Will be back in 30 min or so. |
| Alex G. | has left the room |
| Casey L. | has left the room |
| Paul H. | has left the room |
| Tony A. | has left the room |
| AKMA A. | has left the room |
| Jeff | has left the room |
| Brough T. | has left the room |
| Justin H. | has left the room |
| Philip R. | has left the room |
| fpaynter | @judi do you have a separate audio feed? |
| Mar 30 | 12:20 PM |
| Doc S. | has left the room |
| iz | has left the room |
| Steve S. | has left the room |
| Chris S. | has left the room |
| Joshua B. | has left the room |
| Dana S. | has left the room |
| JoePlotkin | has left the room |
| Anders F. | has left the room |
| Micah S. | has left the room |
| Don J. | has left the room |
| Greg E. | has left the room |
| Stig | has left the room |
| Benoit F. | has left the room |
| Mar 30 | 12:25 PM |
| David B. | has left the room |
| Nick G. | has left the room |
| Alice J. | has left the room |
| Mar 30 | 12:30 PM |
| John S. | has left the room |
| Aymeril H. | has left the room |
| ruralbroadband | has entered the room |
| Jean R. | has left the room |
| Don J. | has entered the room |
| Mar 30 | 12:35 PM |
| ruralbroadband | has left the room |
| Jim R. | has left the room |
| Frans-Anton | has left the room |
| Fred H. | has left the room |
| Julie W. | has entered the room |
| Herman W. | has left the room |
| Mar 30 | 12:50 PM |
| Justin H. | has entered the room |
| Marvin G. | has entered the room |
| isen | has left the room |
| The B. | has entered the room |
| AKMA A. | has entered the room |
| Mar 30 | 12:55 PM |
| The B. | has left the room |
| The B. | has entered the room |
| The B. | Hello from the band... |
| AKMA A. | Hello to the band |
| The B. | The drummer's mac has a problem. Can anyone help? |
| Dean L. | talk to me |
| Dean L. | re the mac |
| Dirk | has entered the room |
| Tom V. | I have Roland TD-15s that I sometimes run through my Mac -- but I'm not there so I don't know what the problem is... |
| Judi C. | and streaming audio and audio/video is back. |
| Mar 30 | 1:00 PM |
| Tom V. | same url for audio/video? |
| Jeff | has entered the room |
| JoePlotkin | has entered the room |
| The B. | Clusterpluk! |
| Lynn S. | has left the room |
| Tony A. | has entered the room |
| Jean R. | has entered the room |
| Mar 30 | 1:05 PM |
| Brett G. | Pluckter... Huh? |
| Judi C. | yes |
| Judi C. | same url for audio and video streams |
| Marvin G. | has left the room |
| The B. | See you later.....The Band |
| Joshua B. | has entered the room |
| Brett G. | ...that it's a bad idea? |
| Michael W. | has entered the room |
| David W. | I got myself a copy of the John Jorgenson CD - available somewhere in the building.. |
| Nick G. | has entered the room |
| Glenn S. | Bring it on - What happened to Muniwireless>? |
| The B. | has left the room |
| Dirk | Alcatel will be the hardware provider for the next 100,000 subs in Amsterdam. Perhaps Esme will be one of those 100 K ... |
| Ken D. | Basically the industry collapsed. |
| Nathaniel J. | has entered the room |
| Glenn S. | Hey Ken D. was there ever really an industry? |
| Ken D. | The concept remains but the need for a business model that will work is still up for grabs. |
| Brett G. | It's not just the incumbents who have observed this. It IS a failure. |
| Ken D. | I would say yes. |
| Ken D. | Ah, another expert heard from. |
| Philip R. | has entered the room |
| MaryBeth H. | has entered the room |
| Ken D. | There are several successes. |
| Ken D. | St Cloud comes to mind. |
| Ken D. | Minneapolis certainly showed its worth. |
| Glenn S. | Yes, there are successes, but I am uncertain whether there was an industry that failed |
| Justin H. | I'll hold my opinion until the post-mortem. |
| Ken D. | I can name several others, if necessary. |
| Mar 30 | 1:10 PM |
| Paul B. | has left the room |
| Brett G. | I don't see the Minnesota efforts as successes. They didn't solve any actual problem. |
| Glenn S. | I think it was a lack of complete understanding of the needs of the people using it |
| Ken D. | Well, Sky Pilot would like to weigh in on the issue but... |
| Hilarie C. | has entered the room |
| Steve S. | has entered the room |
| Glenn S. | OK |
| Ken D. | I agree. |
| Glenn S. | here we go!! |
| Justin H. | Awesome... I LOVE RAP! |
| Ken D. | And the associated peripherals that would have sent these networks into success. |
| Ken D. | WiFi phones that acted like cell phones. |
| Brett G. | William Blake? "Wi-Fi, Wi-Fi, burning bright...." |
| Ken D. | Beam forming equipment that could actually be cost justified, to name two |
| Alex G. | has entered the room |
| Justin H. | it's all about the microwave |
| Lynn S. | has entered the room |
| Brent S. | has entered the room |
| Ken D. | 802.11P would have added to the overall demand as well as off theshelf WiFi meter reading equipment. |
| Nick G. | blake on fiber - "to see the world in a grain of sand" |
| David Z. | has entered the room |
| Stig | has entered the room |
| AKMA A. | "in a fiber of silicon" -- or wireless, they're synergistic |
| Brett G. | My
own wireless ISP started as a co-op. Guess what? The members prevailed
upon me and my wife to take it private, so that there would be capital
investment. |
| Glenn S. | Civitium failed as well so lets not forget their role in this |
| Brett G. | She is admitting that municipal wireless is unsustainable and must be propped up with tax money.... |
| Ken D. | So how long will it take you to build out to the 135K subscription base? |
| Bob F. | has entered the room |
| Mar 30 | 1:15 PM |
| Ken D. | I'm not sure failed is the right word, there were no best practices that could be replicated. |
| Lynn H. | has entered the room |
| Ken D. | Kind of inventing as we went along. |
| Brett G. | Ken D.: Was that question directed at me or at the speaker? |
| Glenn S. | Anchor tenants like schools and health centres are what we used in Macedonia and Montenegro |
| harold g. | has entered the room |
| Ken D. | That was directed at you Brett. |
| Alex G. | I bet that phila changed the equipment providers to the network too |
| Bob F. | The idea of wireless as public infrastructure if powerful -- even better when coupled with wired infrastructure. |
| Ken D. | You are a staunched proponent of Wireless (as am I) but you seem to feel that MuniWireless was a dead end. |
| Brett G. | Ken, we don't have a "135K subscription base." The population of our county is about 30,000. |
| Ken D. | How do you reconcile that? |
| Ken D. | I understand that. |
| David W. | 50% in philadelphia only? |
| Shmuel F. | has entered the room |
| Geoff D. | has entered the room |
| Ken D. | How
would you go about building out a municipality where your expected
subscription rate would hit 135K in a 130 square mile area? |
| Ron C. | has entered the room |
| Bob F. | What is the subscription rate for municipal streets? |
| Brett G. | Actually,
3G is much better than you'll get on a free, public Wi-Fi network once
the P2Pers and video streamers get done sucking up all the bandwidth. |
| Ken D. | St Cloud Florida is now somewhere around 85%, last I heard. |
| Charles B. | has entered the room |
| Brett G. | Ken, that wouldn't be hard to do. I'd love to have a chance to get that kind of market penetration. |
| Ken D. | So
you are saying that even with 802.11N you cannot deliver free service
or even a low cost unlicensed service for a large scale network? |
| Casey L. | has entered the room |
| AKMA A. | "Sucking up bandwidth" = "generating demand for stronger connectivity" |
| Ken D. | This isn't a design consideration? |
| David W. | Brett, are you now switching sides in the wireless v cable debate? |
| iz | has entered the room |
| Paul H. | has entered the room |
| shep | has entered the room |
| Ken D. | I understand that Brett. |
| iz | she's talking rob poor's dream ember.com |
| Lawrence K. | has entered the room |
| Ken D. | and they would supply you all the funding you would need. |
| Jen G. | has entered the room |
| Mar 30 | 1:20 PM |
| Ken D. | But for some reason we couldn't tie the two disparate ends together. |
| Brett G. | 802.11n
is a spectrum hog. What's more, 802.11b clients slow it down to 802.11b
speeds. And you haven't even considered the cost of backbone
bandwidth.... |
| Brett G. | David W: I don't follow your question. |
| Bob F. | Esme
is describing the Internet dynamic -- once you have an "anchor"
application (like email) you discover what else you can do. If you have
to build a network for "high value" apps you'll lock yourself into high
costs and thus reinforce the idea of scarcity. With a dynamic you keep
the cost close to zero and discover new applications which mean more
capacity in a virtuous cycle. |
| Ken D. | Backbone bandwidth prices? When you hit 100K users you should be close to peering. |
| Brett G. | Ken: Nowhere near it. |
| Alex G. | we do already have an alternative to the postal system |
| Ken D. | With businesses? |
| Ken D. | Really? |
| Glenn S. | Free doesn't pay the bills however. I am all for free if it pays the bills |
| Bob F. | The post office does routing very much better than IP does because it has stable addresses adn stable names |
| Ken D. | Do you have any idea how many huge businesses there are in Philly? |
| Ken D. | But they get serviced with Fiber. |
| Ken D. | Wireless is secondary |
| Bob F. | It's not about "free", it's about functional vs dysfunctional funding m,odels. |
| Glenn S. | Free IS a model however. |
| Ken D. | Bob - agreed |
| Brett G. | Ah,
all the "socialist" buzzwords. "Open Source." Bandwidth as some sort of
civil right or entitlement. (Gee, shouldn't natural gas or electricity
be a civil right too?) |
| Ken D. | Free is only one small part of a larger set of revenues streams |
| Glenn S. | Of course it is all about an appropriate business model |
| Ken D. | AMR. |
| Brett G. | Free as in beer. |
| Ken D. | Security. |
| Bob F. | What
does "free" mean -- you mean paid for as infrastructure from general
revenue -- that is how we deal with infrastructure that has value as a
whole even if individual elements in themselves don't have measurable
value |
| Ken D. | 802.11P |
| Aleecia M. | has entered the room |
| Brett G. | And a complete detachment from economic reality. |
| Ken D. | Free also works in the St Cloud model. |
| Ramon E. | has left the room |
| Ken D. | Cost avoidance for broadband costs was estimated at $480 per year. |
| Brett G. | TANSTAAFL |
| Glenn S. | The
free model works when there is advertising, or the anchor tenant can
cover the entire costs associated with the services and allows others
to use the network |
| Ken D. | Property taxes averaged $400/year. |
| Ken D. | Municipality pays for the network and justifies the cost from AMR. |
| Dan G. | has entered the room |
| Ken D. | Advertsiing sucks. |
| Mar 30 | 1:25 PM |
| Brett G. | Why
prey on an anchor tenant? And why should taxpayers pay for it via
taxes, undercutting private enterprise and killing opportunities for
job creation and innovation? |
| Ken D. | It directs the sharks right to the people least able to resist them. |
| Alex G. |
|
| Ken D. | Because the AMR savings pay for the network and the ongoing costs. |
| Alex G. |
|
| iz | someone should tell the speaker to get closer to the mike |
| iz | the softness is detracting from his speech |
| Brett G. | Why not contract with a private provider for AMR? |
| Fred J. | has entered the room |
| Ken D. | Studies show cost reduction in building inspections, police mobility and other services the community enjoys. |
| Alex G. | iz: it's the post lunch coma |
| Joshua B. | about that david simon article, it goes back to what Ellen Miller was talking about re: sunlight |
| Brett G. | Building inspections? |
| Alex G. | y |
| Herman W. | has entered the room |
| Ken D. | To build out a citywdie network that lays unused the rest of the time when AMR is not being used? |
| catherine | has entered the room |
| Joshua B. | but it needs to apply to local governments and it needs to have teeth |
| Garret S. | has entered the room |
| Ken D. | Waste of resources |
| Joshua B. | so you don't have to be a dogged reporter to get the info |
| Brett G. | Ken, our own network could provide AMR |
| Ken D. | We ddin't have 100% coverage nor do most WISPs. |
| Ken D. | Do you have 100% coverage? |
| Michael W. | has left the room |
| isen | has entered the room |
| Stephan | has entered the room |
| Brett G. | We're
approaching 100%. A few more access points and we will be there. Of
course, if we had a contract to do AMR, we could cost-justify building
out quite a lot if we needed to. |
| Judi C. | SPEAKERS: Please speak INTO the mic on the podium |
| Justin H. | Sounds just like GM and America's light rail system |
| Alex G. | anyone read The Big Switch? I'm reading it now |
| Glenn S. | I
heard this great idea today from Jim Lehrer - he said all newspapers
should be advertising free but cut down to 10-16 pages with their
pricing doubled. He feels that the death of the newspaper would be
slowed down |
| Brett G. | Sascha is speaking in favor of competition but then advocating municipal networking -- which is anticompetitive. |
| catherine | Fredericton,NB Canada is another example of a free network. see case study at http://www.CWIRP.org |
| Bob F. | That's
the problem - the FCC maintains a businss model on the naive assumption
that it is aligned with public interest. Today it's 180 out of phase
becuase it still maintains the idea we need carriers as railraods |
| Jen G. | Re:
taxpayers subsidizing infrastructure and broadband killing
innovation/job creation... doesn't mean they don't pay for services
they want. Innovative companies will find ways to create things people
want. Postal service > Netflix. |
| Brett G. | See the disconnect? |
| Mar 30 | 1:30 PM |
| Dan A. | has entered the room |
| David W. | mysterious clapping...what was it in favor of? |
| John S. | has entered the room |
| Jen G. | (He leaned into the mic for a sec.) |
| iz | this panel isn't much of a conversation, it's more of a series of speeches |
| Dirk | Herman
will tomorrow demonstrate what happens when there is no strong
incumbent nor a regulsator so people find their own solutions)in Bangla
Desh awesomw' |
| iz | I feel bad for the last guy who'll have 2 minutes |
| Brett G. | Jen: If you've killed the private providers, people won't be able to buy anything else. |
| Don J. | I am guessing criticism of FCC |
| Alex G. | iz: or maybe no Q&A |
| Erik C. | has entered the room |
| Brett G. | What's
more, muni wireless in particular is a very bad idea because it doesn't
just compete unfairly; it also trashes the spectrum, making it
impossible for competitors to get on the air. |
| Aymeril H. | has entered the room |
| Justin H. | Ditchdiggers are going to get very rich... everyone else meet your new overlords |
| Ken D. | Then you should approach the utilities, including your local water company, and see if you can put that deal together. |
| Charles B. | Get rid of the FCC. We don't need it. Waste of time and reinforces the telecom dyanmic. |
| Justin H. | FCC is supposed to be a voice to monitor the public trust |
| Erik C. | Regulate markets, not technology. Punt this over to FTC. |
| Justin H. | they just need to reassess how they perform that role. |
| Jeff | has left the room |
| Brett G. | Ironically,
there are far more PUBLIC agencies coming to the NTIA and USDA for
money than there are private entities. (This is perhaps due to drops in
tax revenues.) State governments are asking the NTIA and USDA to give
them priority over private businesses in their states or to make them
gatekeepers (adding another layer of bureaucracy to the stimulus) |
| Justin H. | Very GM sounding |
| Alex G. | we need an actual engineering function at the FCC |
| Alex G. | as opposed to "well you said BPL would work and they said it doesn't so we'll wait." |
| Ken D. | Brett, that isn't always the case as in where carrier neutral networks are built. |
| Brett G. | The FCC has a Chief Technologist again. (Is he there in the room?) |
| Mar 30 | 1:35 PM |
| Ken D. | This allows each "service provider" to focus on service. |
| David W. | If only there were some sort of mic that gave a speaker local control over its placement.... if only ... |
| Rafael D. | has entered the room |
| Dana S. | has entered the room |
| Doc S. | has entered the room |
| Andrew F. | has entered the room |
| Glenn S. | The mike is movable but he keeps moving away from it. |
| Jeff | has entered the room |
| Andrew F. | FCC technologist (Jon Peha) is on next panel. |
| David W. | the mike is movable within a sphere of a fixed radius. |
| John S. | Good job Sasha! It's great to hear it simply said... |
| AKMA A. | Or 1337 voice projection skillz |
| Brett G. | So-called
"carrier neutral" networks would be a help if (a) they did not
duplicate existing infrastructure and (b) they were really neutral. The
fiber deployment in Powell, WY, for example, failed both tests. It
overlaid DSL and cable and gave one provider an exclusive. (The
developers claimed that they couldn't make it financially viable
without doing this.) |
| David W. | he calls that a gut? hahaha. |
| Justin H. | Esme picked good people.. huzzah to her |
| AKMA A. | Wait till he's 50 |
| Brett G. | Depends on the application. ATM is much better than Ethernet/IP for voice. |
| harold g. | has left the room |
| Justin H. | in other words "keep it real" |
| David W. | Is the 2.0 version of the 2.0 meme 3.0 or 4.0? |
| Charles B. | Why am I being censored? Is this connected repression? |
| Mar 30 | 1:40 PM |
| Brett G. | We
did our own research on wireless technologies years ago, and have been
augmenting it to this day. That's why we've shunned WiMAX, which is
indeed overhyped. |
| Glenn S. | Strix is one company that lied about their coverage density. |
| Judi C. | Charles,
I don't see that you're being censored. I don't have the technology
(nor time) to do so. If you think there's a technical problem, please
email me |
| Glenn S. | This guy just said FREE is not a model either |
| Brett G. | He's right. |
| Charles B. | Re: The FCC - a corrupt puppet of Congress. Didn't show up on the thread previously. |
| Tom V. | has left the room |
| Stephan | has left the room |
| Brett G. | You
can't solve the problem of using inappropriate technology by throwing
more infrastructure at it. Ten times the Wi-Fi nodes will STILL not get
into every building. |
| Andrew F. | Oh
come on, FCC is not a puppet of Congress. Under Martin it hardly
cooperated with Congress, no matter who chaired the committees. |
| Justin H. | What
about microwave beams? They act like wire, right? That's like saying
"we'll always have toasters" yet we have microwave ovens |
| Lynn H. | live feed down? |
| Andrew F. | (see House E&C report to Dingell) |
| iz | not to mention tickets! |
| saschameinrath | has entered the room |
| Brett G. | I'm still getting video and audio. |
| iz | do those help pay for the meters? |
| Greg E. | has entered the room |
| Don J. | he mentioned tropos and firetide, what was the third? |
| Ken D. | Brett - too bad you never got to play with the Go Networks beam forming equipment. |
| Ken D. | It got into basements. |
| Aymeril H. | has left the room |
| Charles B. | Just what we need, a reference to a joint Congressional - FCC confab. Down please. |
| Brett G. | Alas, Ken, beam forming cannot change the laws of physics. Shannon's Law still applies. |
| Andrew F. | um...what? |
| Mar 30 | 1:45 PM |
| Andrew F. | it was an investigation of the FCC's operations and management under ex-chairman Martin |
| Alex G. | did anyone pick up a Radio Shack extension cord? |
| Ken D. | No but a higher power exemption sure changes the game. |
| Chris S. | has entered the room |
| Lawrence K. | Ok.... I'm not trying to throw rocks...but is the parking meter application the most exciting muni application? |
| Charles B. | Who does the FCC report to? |
| Andrew F. | the commission was -NOT- a tool of congress during his chairmanship, by any means. |
| Ken D. | Lawrence K. - No, no it isn't. |
| Brett G. | An increase in the allowed power changes the game even without beam forming technology. |
| Ken D. | Look up 802.11p among others. |
| Andrew F. | Actually, it's an independent regulatory commission subject to congressional oversight |
| Alex G. | Kevin Martin was the Harriet Miers of the FCC -- his qualification was that he was the lawyer for the Bush/Cheney 2000 camapaign |
| Ken D. | We have also been talking about AMR (Automated Meter Reading) |
| Doc S. | Why is wimax slow on the uplink side? |
| Brett G. | Lawrence: It's exciting when you're racing the meter maid to feed the meter. ;-) |
| Charles B. | that must be why we have a much stronger duopoly in telecom right now. Martin was carrying the water for K" Street. |
| Ken D. | But beam forming allows you to up the power without self polluting. |
| Ken D. | A key point, I'm sure you would agree |
| Brett G. | Doc: WiMAX is slow on the uplink due to the polling scheme. |
| Anders F. | has entered the room |
| Lawrence K. | Brett....ahah....does
that mean that as a parking meter USER also have access to the meter
data, so that I can race the meter maid? |
| Casey L. | should be talking smart grid -- not just AMR. AMR is a narrow piece of it. |
| Brett G. | Ken: Beam forming still self-pollutes. |
| Ken D. | Less than an omni, for example. |
| Doc S. | What
happens when Sprint, which is putting wimax everywhere, deploys? How
about when they do it with a free card and a $30/mo price? (Guessing at
that number. Have no idea.) |
| Ken D. | and yes, everything self-pollutes |
| Chris S. | Alex:
Unfair to Kevin. He worked as a senior staff person for an FCC
commissioner for several years after the '96 Act passed. THEN he went
to Bush-Cheney -00, then he got on the FCC |
| Nathaniel J. | has left the room |
| Rafael D. | has left the room |
| Andrew F. | Actually Alex |
| Andrew F. | Martin worked as a legal adviser to Harold Furchtgott-Roth, a Clinton appointee |
| Brett G. | Lawrence:
You already know the meter data if you know when your time will run
out, right? Or do you want GPS data on the meter maid? |
| Tony A. | Parking meters are going away. Pay and display is hugely more profitable for munis and they are converting as fast as they can. |
| Alex G. | okay Andrew Chris -- but Martin often appeared to follow WH orders -- |
| Alex G. | rather than advice from staff or any consistent rules |
| Charles B. | A legal advisor? That's a qualification, and perfectly displays the problem. |
| Mar 30 | 1:50 PM |
| Glenn S. | Parking meters going the way of Virgin Mega-Stores |
| Mar 30 | 1:50 PM |
| Justin H. | many munis think otherwise |
| iz | but freedom of speech is a leftist buzzword, right brett? |
| Alex G. | At
least with Powell we knew what his perspective was -- provided some
consistency -- with Martin ISPs have an opponent who was capricious as
well as unpleasant. |
| David W. | Parking meters going the way of virgins and mega-stores? |
| Andrew F. | Charles: what other qualifications do you suggest |
| Chris S. | Alex:
Don't get me wrong; I'm no fan of Chairman Martin's tenure. I think he
did a number of bad things. But it wasn't because he was clueless. |
| Andrew F. | (agrees with Chris) |
| Alex G. | It was because W was clueless? |
| Andrew F. | no, it was because he was a poor manager. |
| Glenn S. | David W. No, we are moving towards mega-stores so I guess it is the former. |
| Tony A. | It's
a tough balance. In my town they put in the pay-and-display to increase
revenue, over the loud objections of the chamber of commerce, who
(rightly) felt it was shopper hostile. |
| Alex G. | he was a great success at burrowing |
| Brett G. | No, freedom of speech is not a "leftist buzzword." |
| Judi C. | public service note: A magnitude 4.3 event occurred 18 km (11 miles) N of Morgan Hill, CA. |
| Chris S. | I
think it was because his model was that you can trust America's large
successful corporations to find ways to make money while keeping the
customer satisfied. Hence what Verizon & AT&T wanted they
tended to get. |
| Aleecia M. | has left the room |
| Alex G. | . . . and that's not clueless? just asking :-) |
| Jeff | OK, we've covered the past, what about Julius Genachowski? |
| Andrew F. | Chris: I think he also still was scarred from the NextWave debacle |
| Ken D. | It's safe |
| Justin H. | well, it was a simple solution... if not the best one |
| Brett G. | In a competitive market, that's actually true. And that's why we need not to regulate but rather to encourage competition. |
| Alex G. | don't know much about julius yet but we trust Kevin W and Susan to pick someone good |
| Glenn S. | Judi C - 4.3 doesn't even create a nice rumble. |
| isen | Julius can't say anything until he is confirmed |
| Chris S. | Alex: No, that's just being wrong. I reserve "clueless" for another mental state altogether |
| Brett G. | Regulation, or government competition with the private sector, would kill the competition we need. |
| JoePlotkin | we need to regulate to ENSURE aand ENFORCE competition |
| Alex G. | Chris: understood |
| Justin H. | but that's talking big... I want to build an ISP in my shed |
| David W. | Structural separation would encourage competition |
| AKMA A. | Deregulation servbe us so well in the financial sector |
| Chris S. | Brett,
I'm not sure that competition will actually produce the results we
want, without some intelligent regulations surrounding it. |
| Lawrence K. | I
was at the Holocaust museum yesterday and they have an exhibit on the
use of radio and television in Germany during the rise of the Nazis,
and how radio (one-way dissemination) became the way to control the
message from the govt, to the population. They even had their own
subsidized hardware; the Volksemfanger, (sp? ) the radio version of the
Volkswagen. |
| Brett G. | Joe: Exactly. And this is why the only regulation we should impose should be prohibition of anticompetitive tactics. |
| Alex G. | bway.net is a censorship-resistant network |
| Andrew F. | Genachowski has experience in the industry from many angles. He's not exactly another Reed Hundt. |
| JoePlotkin | Structural Separation, or the more severe Divestiture2 |
| Chris S. |
|
| Brett G. | Chris: Competition naturally gives consumers what they want, because they will switch if they do not get it. |
| Mar 30 | 1:55 PM |
| JoePlotkin | radio was used to similar effect in Rwandan genocide |
| Chris S. | Brett:
Assumes that people actually rationally choose in their own interest,
which is not, as it turns out, supported by the data |
| Andrew F. | Brett: you are so wrong. we have competition and I still can't get what I want. |
| Brett G. | Joe: You probably were at CITI's "structural separation" conference last week. Any interesting points to share? |
| Chris S. | Andrew, we don't need to hear about your personal problems... <g> |
| Andrew F. | rofl |
| JoePlotkin | Brett - yes but not easily summerized in this medium |
| Brett G. | Andrew:
I'm tempted to quote a song.... Seriously, if what you want is
everything for nothing, no; you won't get what you want. But with
competition you'll get the best that's feasible. |
| JoePlotkin | whats the limit on Rolling Stone references? |
| Justin H. | this is distracting... will the video be online to view later... that sounds important and I'm thinking about competition issues |
| Glenn S. | It also happened nationwide in Macedonia and Montenegro |
| JoePlotkin | Stones |
| David W. | Hey, you, could into my cloud. |
| Tony A. | With "competition" in telecom as it exists today, I can't get what I want, but I cant even get what I need. |
| Andrew F. | i'll pay for what i want |
| David W. | cold = get |
| David W. | cold = could |
| Andrew F. | the Jagger principle does not apply |
| Glenn S. | but Point to Point leading to WIFI at the end points |
| David W. | oh forget it |
| JoePlotkin | get offa my cloud! |
| Andrew F. | becuse what I want isn't what I need, either. |
| Charles B. | Andrew, did you see my response? |
| Tony A. | get off of *my* cloud |
| Andrew F. | Charles: no, I did not. |
| Alex G. | whose cloud, tony? |
| Tony A. | Joe: I type too slowly. |
| Brett G. | Start me up.... |
| Andrew F. | oooooh...the cloud..... |
| JoePlotkin | hahaha |
| AKMA A. | Muni cloud or privately-owned and -operated cloud? |
| Stig | |
| Dana S. | has left the room |
| JoePlotkin | Tony, dont have your 19th nervous breakdown . . . |
| David W. | 19th nervous network breakdown, needs Martin's little helper |
| Steve S. | those clever Italians |
| iz | ouch |
| Dirk | Vienna
sounds great, but what when Telekom Austria and UPC start to take
notice - between them they managed to kill the Vienna FttH project... |
| Brett G. | They have lots of fallen arches, too. |
| Alex G. | Dirk: what are the dates on Vienna FttH? |
| Alex G. | when did it happen? |
| Charles B. | I
repeat, if you actually think the FCC is anything other than a
political extension of Congress, and heavily subject to the political
influence (corruption) then you need to bone-up a little on the history
of the telecosm. Chairman martin, chairman powell, chairman mao, blah,
blah: all useless. |
| Steve S. | dang, what're they doing in Boston, anyone have a link? |
| Tony A. | Do, da di da da, do da di da Hang Fibre, Hang Fibre |
| Mar 30 | 2:00 PM |
| Alex G. | who was FCC chair at the time of the breakup of AT&T? |
| Brett G. | The FCC is more a political extension of the White House than of Congress, especially when the same party is in control of both. |
| Andrew F. | Quello? |
| David W. | |
| Steve S. | thx David! |
| Andrew F. | Charles: Influence != corruption. And Martin's relationship w/ Congress was ANYTHING but one where he was controlled. |
| Steve S. | and in fact to back Dewayne up I remember serveral f2c's where we had connectivity issues |
| Alex G. | Signal Strength: Excellent -- thanks Dewayne and atlantech |
| Dirk | some
two years ago, Telekom A made a deal with WienStrom to provide the
energy to their VDL PON network. Suddenly Wienstroms sister Blizznet
was not heard from anymore. |
| shep | Dewayne
means 10 or 15 years ago. 5 years ago it was 2004, and events like this
were already using 802.11 like this routinely. |
| Alex G. | we didn't have 64 Mbps from atlantech in the past |
| Judi C. | Tony,
Talk with Hilarie Gardner from Mendocino. Very wet coastal area.
mountains. Big trees. Lots of them. Hang fiber is a best option but
hanging.... not so much. |
| Alex G. | shep -- yes |
| Brett G. | Dewayne,
I'm on via high speed wireless from Wyoming -- with a Netbook up on a
shelf displaying the video and my regular laptop doing the chat. |
| Julie W. | has left the room |
| Charles B. | Hear that Andrew. The tools make the rules. |
| isen | shep, yeah but wifi didn't scale in 2004 -- there was not a conf, including F2C that had good w'less |
| Brett G. | I've advocated the same thing as Dewayne re spectrum allocation and cognitive radio: http://www.brettglass.com/CR/ |
| Judith H. | has entered the room |
| Aymeril H. | has entered the room |
| Alex G. | isen: I believe the semiconductor bash was able to put something together, with massive massive bandwidth |
| Brett G. | The
amateur radio services run as an "open commons," but you're not allowed
to use more power than you need and you can't interfere with anything
else that's licensed |
| AKMA A. |
We've had significant connectivity issues (not Dewayne's fault) in past
F2Cs; the spectacular connectivity this year is different |
| Andrew F. | Ok, I am not going to get into a debate about open commons and spectrum policy. Last one did not go well. |
| Alex G. | and an astonishing number of cisco APs |
| isen | hmmm, and we had a network at f2c that ran well some of the time |
| Geoff D. | has left the room |
| Brett G. | Part 15 causes as many problems as it solves |
| David W. | Also known as spectrum de-lay. |
| Mar 30 | 2:05 PM |
| AKMA A. | Was that the Republican congressman? Spectrum DeLay? |
| Mar 30 | 2:05 PM |
| Charles B. | Of
course not. Any position you may take is ultimately indefensible in the
economic, social or political sphere. As Goethe said Andrew, Know Your
Limitations. |
| Andrew F. | A properly done remaking should NOT take ten years. |
| Wendy S. | has entered the room |
| isen | AKMA don't jinx us -- the divine is still a major force in wireless :-) |
| isen | Notice "dark forces" etc |
| Andrew F. | we rulemaking |
| Andrew F. | er |
| isen | Magic wand etc |
| Brett G. | "Dark forces?" |
| AKMA A. | David, I'm on your side. So far, so good. |
| Andrew F. | a properly done rulemaking should not take ten years. |
| David W. | I want moooore! Mooooooore! |
| Stig | Yes, steeples are popularly used as cell towers. |
| Alex G. | glass-stegall -- another rule we need to remake -- http://isen.com/blog/2009/03/congress-pass… |
| Andrew F. | but Charles, I'm not sure what position I am taking that is indefensible. |
| JoePlotkin | Amen, AlexG |
| Chris S. | Charles, that wasn't Goethe, it was Harry Callahan in the second "Dirty Harry" movie |
| Brett G. | They even had a patent on a way to monopolize it. |
| Chris S. | We don't have buckets of money. $7 billion is a pittance as against the scale of the problem |
| Alex G. | dewayne -- I hear that the net is a pretty good distribution tool for information |
| Brett G. | Metricom failed for several reasons. One was that they thought that AMR would subsidize the network. |
| catherine | has left the room |
| Andrew F. | because
I don't want to burn the FCC down to the ground and actually spend a
fair amount of my time watching the issues and how it has worked (and
not worked) in years past, from positions within the industry and as a
journalist covering the industry? |
| Brett G. | Another was that they couldn't get their costs down. |
| AKMA A. | "Speaking in tongues" -- and people ask me why I come to this conference.... |
| Chris S. | Metricom
didn't declare itself to be a telecommunications provider and therefore
had no legal right to be on the power poles that were integral to its
survival. |
| Judi C. | note
to remote visitors: Quicktime (NOT RealPlayer) a/v stream:
rtsp://odo.warpspeed.com/f2c09.sdp and audio only: Itunes or VLC: http://odo.warpspeed.com:8000/f2c09.mp3 |
| isen | akma lol |
| Jen G. | They do have buckets of money - buckets! Too bad there's an aquifer to fill. Jedi mind tricks - tech mirage. |
| David W. | So, what should we learn from Metricom? |
| Brett G. | Metricom wasn't on power poles; it was on street lights. Important difference. |
| Justin H. | What a great positive panel |
| Mar 30 | 2:10 PM |
| Alex G. | if you have qs ask them |
| JoePlotkin | the chattering classes? |
| Brett G. | I
could give a whole lecture on what we could learn from Metricom. Its
failure taught me a heckuva lot that made my own business succeed. |
| Chris S. | Brett:
not for these purposes. Owned by power companies, rights of access set
by law. Telecom can insist on being there, others can't. |
| Doc S. | I was a Metricom customer. Still have my Ricochet wireless modem somewhere. |
| Don J. | I have/had a ricochet radio modem too. I used to velcro it to the back of my notebook |
| David Y. | I was too. It was pretty cool for its time. And better than the CDPD I had been using before that. |
| Charles B. | Doc, hold onto that. someday it will be a museum piece. |
| Alex G. | they will do DSL the moment you start a local network |
| Brett G. | Chris,
two things. Firstly, there are some real questions as to whether WISPs
can get mandatory pole attachments. Secondly, street lights -- even if
they are attached to power poles, which they may or may not be -- are
generally the domain of municipalities. |
| Justin H. | I'm totally calling Ken tomorrow |
| Gary A. | has entered the room |
| Gary A. | Just
to set the record straight... One of Metricom's greatest assets is that
it actually piggybacked on a broad set of pole rights agreements, which
it inherited from a company it had acquired that had utility metering
technology. That's how they were able to develop a fairly large
footprint. |
| Chris S. | Brett:
I get the issue of pole attachments. In fact, if you need any legal
advice about it, call me; it's part of what my firm and I do. ;-) As to
street lights v. power poles, depends on your jurisdiction. Around here
power companies do them under contract to the municipalities... |
| Mar 30 | 2:15 PM |
| Chris S. | Gary: Yes. But then there was pushback when they wanted to expand. |
| Brett G. | So,
the speaker is suggesting that the municipality should be deceptive,
and claim that the network which is going to compete with private
enterprise is "just for meter reading?" |